"Let's back off from the gaps for a moment"Why?
"Why would you call them wrong? How does everything listed on that site refute Darwin?"
I didn't say everything on that site refuted darwin. However, I am curious how they explain the "species could have appeared suddenly".
"Gaps can be explained by the sheer improbability of a given species being fossilized."
Then please explain why most fossils found are "evolutioned". We have many many species, including humans. With that many species, would common sense not dictate there would be many times more "evoluting" fossils found? Where are all the freaky evoluting species? Where the heck are all the inbetweens???
"Fossils are rare because the process needed to fossilize them was specific and virtually all that died back then did so under conditions that did not lend themselves to fossilization."
Then why do we find so many "evolutioned" species and not any "in the process of evolution" species?
"Fossils are rare"
Then why do we have so many of them?
"But science continues to look and find the answers."
Actually, the only thing they're doing is looking and coming up short of answers.... to their own questions that is. They have answered mine....."species could have appeared suddenly,"....which is what I have stated in my 1st post.
Then why do we find so many "evolutioned" species and not any "in the process of evolution" species? What is an "in the process of evolution" species? What are you looking for, and how would we know it when we found it?
Where are all the freaky evoluting species? Where the heck are all the inbetweens???
The questions you're asking are the equivalent of asking why the offspring of a black parent and a white parent doesn't come out striped or checkerboard. I know I talked to someone else here once who really expected to find animals with four legs plus small, unformed wings, like Spyro, as the transitional between land animals and flying animals:
Is that the kind of thing you think evolution calls for? Because if so, you're mistaken.