Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyTheBear

Considering that science is based on empirical evidence, for scientific questions the answer would be yes.

So I can assume by you failure to cite any empirical evidence to support Fabians assertion that you then agree that Fabians assertion is not supported by science.


28 posted on 10/10/2009 4:24:23 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, ThereÂ’s a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Ira_Louvin
Considering that science is based on empirical evidence, for scientific questions the answer would be yes.

Seems to me that science is based on repeatable experiments that put falsifiable theories to the test.

Empirical evidence can be cited and speculated about, but that does not make such an exercise science.

31 posted on 10/10/2009 4:55:04 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson