Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
The Constitution was a mistake. The anti-feds were right.

Which portions of the anti-federalist papers resonate most?

75 posted on 10/09/2009 10:57:50 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Truth to the Left is that which advances their goals. Factuality is irrelevant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie
I posted a few quotes. Actually, some of them didn't go far enough, and decided that a Bill of Rights would address their concerns. They were wrong about that. And the BoR contained some glaring errors in its own right.

The basic idea which resonates with me is that the Constitution created a centralized government that would not be contained, and that obliterated state sovereignty. That the safeguards sounded nice in theory, but would not hold in practice. That the supremacy of the national gubmint would lead to tyranny. That it was way more gubmint than was necessary. That judicial tyranny was a threat to liberty. etc.

76 posted on 10/09/2009 11:04:08 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

Impossible day to carry on a serious discussion. Would like to know your interest in the anti-feds, etc.


77 posted on 10/09/2009 11:29:33 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson