[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[Blood of Tyrants]

Why not? It makes killing unborn babies easier.

[smartymarty]

How does it go??? If a lie gets repeated often enough and long enough people will believe it?

[fishtank]

“Global warming” proves that “Darwinism” is not the only science fraud in the henhouse.

[Dewey Revoltnow]

I always wondered what happened to old lively lips.

[Boogieman]

Here’s a common double-standard that we should be pretty familiar with by now. Evolutionists can used whatever bogus and debunked evidence they want to prop up their “theory”, but if their opponents mention any of these things, the apologists say “Nobody ever uses that anymore, you just don’t know the current state of evolutionary theory”.

These jokers should be thanking creationists for bringing some much needed critical examination to their work. It’s an essential part of their scientific method, which they have neglected to pursue themselves. Without us, they would allow errors to continue to perpetuate as long as they seem convenient to influence popular opinion.

[Psycho_Bunny]

Lololol.......Citing Dawkins in a science arguement is the same as citing Fred Phelps in a discussion of Christian theology.

[CottShop]

[[No Joke: Richard Dawkins Still Peddling Haeckel’s Fraudulent Embryo Diagrams!]]

I’m afrai Richard Dawkins IS a joke- and it’s no wonder He’s afraid to debate ID scientists, because he knows as soon as he does, he will be exposed as the blatant liar and deceiver that he is, and if he’s still using the embryo diagrams as his ‘evidence’, then he’s going to come off looking rather innept and unqualified and he knows that- His tactic is simpyl to state whatever he wants, whenver he wants, and refuse to be held accountible for his assinine claims- that way’ in his mind, he’s ‘never wrong’.

Dawkins is losing his mind- He’s no longer relevent

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Especially when he could have used actual pictures.

[count-your-change]

Dawkins is like the guy at the end of the bar; he’s always good for some outrageous statement made more newsworthy by his unshakable belief in his correctness.

[scripter]

Incredibly, I have a few friends who insist Haeckel's diagrams are still relevant and the theory of recapitulation has not been discredited... but my friends are about as liberal as they come.

Even after loaning my copy of Gould's book Ontogeny and Phylogeny, my liberal friends would deny deny deny. Sad, really.

[whattajoke]

I wonder... How many of you sought out the video clip in question? How many of you found it odd that "Evolution News" didn't link the actual video clip? How many of you stopped for just a millisecond to think, "Hm, I'd like to see Dawkins look like the fool I know him to be, so why didn't this article link me see and hear it for myself?"

I suspect none of you did that. Why not? You accept creationist apologetics at face value? You really shouldn't do that, for they've been shown time and time again to be greater frauds than Haeckel's drawings ever were.

If anyone cares, at no point does Dawkins say Haeckel's name or use the drawings as any sort of "proof" of evolution. In the video, there is a short clip of various hand/flipper bones followed by the cited various embryo drawings.

The narration states simply that Darwin was fascinated by what appeared to be similarities in skeletal structures and embryotic development. Are you telling me there is no similarity in those things?

It is true that Darwin sought the insight of fellow scientists of his day. Haeckel was a contemporary (though is infamous drawings weren't published until 5 yrs after Origins) and like it or not, embryos DO develop similarly across species and like it or not, Darwin was interested in that and like it or not... Dawkins used that in a historical context.

Now really... Is that so awful? Do you all still feel like "Dawkins is using Haeckel's fraudulent drawings to promote the lie of evolution?" I must admit, I almost expected the video to say, "here are Haeckel's drawings later shown to be fraudulent." Because it wouldn't have surprised me in the least that EvolutionNews was lying to that extent.

Here it is... You can skip to 16:55 to skip all the Satanic liberal sciency stuff.