Still, every time I start to think, “. . . yeah, Keyes is discerning and Orly wouldn't make the same mistake again . . .”, I feel this sudden chilling burst of reality that if we are to discover that Orly misstated/misunderstood the situation and others more competent fell for her story, it would not be merely the second time we have seen such a mistake. It feels like there have been at least a half dozen other similar situations on this rollercoaster directly related to the valiant Dr. Taitz.
As I've said before, it certainly appears that Orly has a devout heart to do what's right and I applaud that. However, I will strongly doubt any statement like this until it is corroborated on the docket.
Is there someone brave enough to ask the Admin Monitor to tag the headline of this thread as “(awaiting confirmation)”, to help the buzz die down until we have something more solid?
SJ, thanks for trying to keep hope alive. I especially appreciate that your attitude is "I doubt it" rather than, "I know you're wrong!". That goes a long way.
Hate to ruin your day and mine, but this is yet another overblow misrepresentation of what the Order says. It’s really becoming frustrating that something so basic can be so wildly misconstrued. 700+ posts later.
Keyes, as the client, can only report what he is told by his attorney, but it appears he will have to get another attorney to review what he’s told by the one representing him in court. This is just too embarassing.