Hate to ruin your day and mine, but this is yet another overblow misrepresentation of what the Order says. It’s really becoming frustrating that something so basic can be so wildly misconstrued. 700+ posts later.
Keyes, as the client, can only report what he is told by his attorney, but it appears he will have to get another attorney to review what he’s told by the one representing him in court. This is just too embarassing.
I'm a birther because I remain convinced that there is a clear strong argument that Obama’s eligibility hasn't been sufficiently documented, but sometimes I feel a little bit “guilty by association” with the people who will just fall for anything that sounds like it could be good news.
In baseball, sometimes a batter will be coached to toss his bat aside and start jogging to 1st base when he wants the ump to call "ball four" on a pitch that he knows was in the strike zone and one he should have swung at.
Sometimes I think that Orly was given counsel similar to that or that her culture gap steers her in that direction. She seems to think that the best way to “work” a trial is to always interpret and report any episode as being in her favor, even when a careful evaluation would reveal otherwise. It's like she thinks the judges will be fooled into calling "ball four" just because she started her cheerful jog down the first base line.
I would guess that if judges actually get wind of these antics, it would only serve to annoy them.
But then again, that's only a guess.