It involves the peculiar notion that British immigration authorities will declare the head of a foreign state a bastard, in order to interfere in the political process of that foreign state, on the basis of a supposed tribal marriage in Kenya with no known, legal record, that somehow trumps a legal, recorded marriage in the United States.
The chief promoter of this notion is Freeper RummyChick. The claimed basis is found in British citizenship statutes pertaining to those citizens who are descendants of former CUKC's, citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies.
I'll leave you to be inundated with Void Ab Initio beyond all cognitio.
Have fun!
It is the law. Believe it or don’t believe it.
he didn’t have UK citizenship or Kenya citizenship.
We do not know whether the marriage to Kezia was “tribal” or civil. Kezia is alive and may testify. Has any credible investigator been given access to the civil marriage files of the corrupt, possibly Obama-protecting Kenya gov’t?
You are assuming that current UK authorities will corrupt themselves to cover for Obama by issuing a transparently false assessment of the Kenya marriage if the facts show there was a marriage (say if Kezia pulls out a 1957 license), as US elites have done for Obama. That is a peculiar notion to me.
BTW, BO Sr was not a former CUKC citizen, he was an actual CUKC citizen when BO Jr was born.
“In the alternative” (should there be “only” a “tribal marriage”) the US now worships at the alter of recognizing diversity that is contrary to traditional Judeo-Christian custom such as marriage between same sexes and self-designation of gender. Are the liberal US political elites going to invalidate a Kenyan marriage sealed with a dowry according to Kezia just because it didn't conform to the technicalities imposed by the former racist exploiting colonial masters?