Skip to comments.
News from Alan Keyes: Judge Confirms Eligibility Trial to Proceed
AIPNews.com ^
| October 7, 2009
| Alan Keyes
Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,641-1,648 next last
To: EternalVigilance
This is good news. Let’s get this issue settled.
961
posted on
10/08/2009 10:21:53 AM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: SaraJohnson
"That scares the bejezzus out of you doesnt it! LOLz." Uh, no. Why would it? That's a pretty silly assertion.
962
posted on
10/08/2009 10:23:09 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: SaraJohnson
Seriously, what’s the scholarship program for foreign students? What advantage would there have been in applying for admission or for assistance as an Indonesian national rather than a black American?
963
posted on
10/08/2009 10:26:47 AM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: SaraJohnson
"I figure there is a reason Obama has all these nuts arguing for him as to what is is." Actually, those are the birthers. They're the ones making silly arguments, like arguing about the difference between "date filed" and "date received".
What you've been hearing from us critics is pretty standard stuff. No convolutions involved. You just don't want to hear it.
964
posted on
10/08/2009 10:26:58 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: Non-Sequitur
FBI did not get authority to carry firearms until 1934, but used them before anyway. INS used implied authority until about 1990, IRS as of 1996 did not have authority and according to them:
According to the IRS, there is no statutory authority for special agents to carry firearms. The General Counsel, Department of the Treasury, has concluded that no specific authority is necessary where a federal officer has the authority to make an arrest and that the authority to carry a firearm is implicit.
http://www.gao.gov/archive/1996/gg96154.pdf IMPLIED LAW
Eligibility is in the Constitution, Enforcement of that requirement is IMPLIED is noting else, and WE the People are ultimately responsible for the Constitution.
965
posted on
10/08/2009 10:27:56 AM PDT
by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: altair
I read the thread of replies by you and OldSwabby, and still contend that in matters of national security, not judicial misconduct, that appointments, signed documents,etc will have to be reversed, as it adversely affects our military, economy, security, etc.
That is my personal opinion, I don’t really know, and when it comes to a person being a usurper to the highest office in the land, it is uncharted territory. I just want our nation whole again.
To: mlo
Show me where I’ve been “uncivil” on this thread.
If any one of my posts qualifies for that in your mind, you’re way too sensitive for Free Republic.
967
posted on
10/08/2009 10:29:03 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
To: mlo
You just don't want to hear it. Considering the important facts you and your cadre studiously ignore, that is downright hilarous.
968
posted on
10/08/2009 10:30:50 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
To: TBP
969
posted on
10/08/2009 10:31:23 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
To: rolling_stone
...Enforcement of that requirement is IMPLIED is noting else... OK, what does it take to enforce it? What is Obama required to do to prove his qualifications?
To: etraveler13
You can remove Obama from the White House, if he is there. You can refer to that as removing him from the Oval Office—a physical location. But you cannot remove him from the Constitutional Office of President of United States if, de jure, he is not POTUS.
971
posted on
10/08/2009 10:36:03 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Those whom the gods would destroy they first make socialist...)
To: curiosity
OK—So it’s not true that a COLB could be obtained in Hawaii for someone whose birth was actually out-of-state or unattended, or on the basis of very slender testimony after the fact? (This is assuming that the Obama COLB is in fact genuine, which we don’t really know.)
972
posted on
10/08/2009 10:36:03 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: Non-Sequitur
OK, what does it take to enforce it? What is Obama required to do to prove his qualifications? He has to prove he is a natural born citizen, 35 years of age and 14 years a resident of the US.
973
posted on
10/08/2009 10:39:04 AM PDT
by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: rolling_stone
He has to prove he is a natural born citizen, 35 years of age and 14 years a resident of the US.Prove to whom? And with what supporting evidence?
974
posted on
10/08/2009 10:39:52 AM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: rolling_stone
Uh since I am talking to you I better clarify that and state Natural Born Citizen of the United States....
975
posted on
10/08/2009 10:40:10 AM PDT
by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Hopefully he’ll have to prove it in a court of law.
976
posted on
10/08/2009 10:40:37 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: EternalVigilance
Considering the important facts you and your cadre studiously ignore, that is downright hilarous. Tell us about the travel ban to Pakistan again.
977
posted on
10/08/2009 10:41:21 AM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: rolling_stone
He has to prove he is a natural born citizen, 35 years of age and 14 years a resident of the US. He did that. He showed a COLB from the state of Hawaii and he's lived in the U.S. for more than the last 14 years. Now what?
To: Genoa
Well he is here 24/7 and he will dispute every words you post just for the heck of it and he will jump in on other postings to see if they will bite on his calculated baits, can you say obamagasm!!!
979
posted on
10/08/2009 10:48:24 AM PDT
by
danamco
To: Non-Sequitur
980
posted on
10/08/2009 10:49:12 AM PDT
by
mel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,641-1,648 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson