Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
Because some officers of government ignore their sworn duty to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, does that then give license to other officers of said government to ignore their sworn obligations as well?
Because no state that I'm aware of requires the candidates from the major parties prove their Constitutional qualifications.
Ah. "Major parties." Where is that in the Constitution?
Oh for crying out loud the law at least is implied,
Which means it’s open to interpretation. Why is your interpetation correct and his is not?
I suggest you read up on implied law before you make any more ASSumptions.
...tell me why federal law enforcement officers carry guns and what law allows them to do so?
I’m betting that whatever law established the particular law enforcement agency also authorized them to carry guns.
Show me the law.
You have been doped, see post 839!!!
See post 839 why they post here 24/7!!!
No, I haven’t. In fact, the person I’m responding to has given me the opportunity to make the most compelling points concerning this critically important matter.
The usurper’s stormtroopers are out in full force, see post 839!!!
You won’t get any intelligent dialog with the usurper’s brown shirts, see post 839
You have been had. The usurper’s trolling brigade are here 24/7 to thwart any of your opinions, see post 839!!!
And that's what I've been asking.
It's it the state election laws.
You see, the “leaches” here work 24/7 to interrupt and distract. You were answering to another post, and then the leach jumps on you to bite on his bait. Ignore them!!!
Sorry, good luck!!!
Show me the law.
And that’s what I’ve been asking.
you used to be slightly annoying, now you are just a joke.
State election laws don't supercede the Constitution, and a lack of a state election law doesn't negate the obligation of every sworn officer of government to uphold the Constitution.
Are you being sarcastic? I'm older than dirt and I just remembered it. However, sometimes, I remember things wrong. ;)
Just because you ignore the answer you've been repeatedly shown doesn't mean the answer has not been given.
"No person except a natural born Citizen...shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
Thanks Publius. You are a better “looker-upper” than I am a “rememberer”. It was a big flap at the time, however.
Obama is a natural-born citizen. Just ask him, he'll tell you.
Obama is a natural-born citizen. Just ask him, he'll tell you.
Note that the same document says he was born in Honolulu.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.