Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
I think you are correct, as he was never president.
I believe that's the case. And it's not the first time.
It looks like Carter was crossing his "i's" and dotting his "t's" with these dates, since, although they were discussed and agreed upon by both plaintiff and defendant attorneys at the previous hearing, they were never entered on the docket.
You sure about that?....
Just asking!
I would think they would throw the entire administration out and give it to the Republicans.
Thanks.
From ORLY’s website (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/):
“Department of Justice was contacted via phone and e-mail and was asked to stipulate to discovery in Barnett et al v Obama et al”
No details given
Irrelevant. That they followed procedure won't save Obama as POTUS, any more than following procedure saves any other Unconstitutional Act of Congress. Having followed required procedure is not the standard; it's whether or not the effect/semantics of the Act fall within Constitutional limits. Confirming an electoral college vote for a person Constiutionally incapable of being POTUS fails that test. End of discussion.
How could Pelosi be POTUS? She would go back down to level Zero if Obama is found to ineligible. She is only in her position as well as Reid due to Obama being POTUS.
Check Orly’s site. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=4727
rofl!!!!
I would prefer they "perp-walk" him out instead of marching.
Not until after the original blitz of yippees died down did the realization come that any discovery she could have was severely limited and could only relate to the MTD issues heard on Monday.
I sincerely want to do anything I can to support this cause, but it's stuff like this from the principal people involved (Keyes, Taitz) that fills me with doubt that the case will proceed. How I hope, I'm wrong.
The good news is that there's still Donofio and MissTickly and maybe something good will come of Apuzzo’s efforts as well.
/rant
I certainly cannot be sure that Congress will follow the constitution, so no.
It is an indication of nothing more than the judge doing what he is supposed to be doing...a normal court formality.
Great news EternalVigilance:)
Thank you.
This is sloppy. Who wrote this? Webmaster or Orly? Most of us laymen realize that you cannot assume it is a go. I appreciate her efforts but do not want to get my hopes up until the judge says it.
Any attorneys here? Is case management scheduling normal when you are waiting for a motion to dismiss?
Don’t forget these arguments from the dumbos: Everybody does it. That’s racist! The constitution is racist!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.