Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: element92

NO airstrikes near “civilian” populations. “Innocent” civilians might get hurt. Haven’t you heard?


102 posted on 10/04/2009 2:12:56 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: MestaMachine
NO airstrikes near “civilian” populations. “Innocent” civilians might get hurt. Haven’t you heard?

Can you imagine being on the ground, taking a lot of enemy fire, and when you call for air support, there is none? The military should NEVER have signed off on Obama's Rules of Engagement (ROE) as he hasn't a clue. The Afghan civilians half the time are helping the Taliban which is what happened in this case. I guess Obama would rather see our troops be killed then the Muslims. If that is not the case, then he needs to withdraw his ROE's and let our troops fight the war not be sitting ducks!

192 posted on 10/04/2009 7:13:01 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson