Here's a little hint: Beck has done more to expose the TRUTH than any other journalist in the past 20 years. Heck, some 20-something year olds did more journalistic research than the entire national industry could manage. It's just not that hard.
So, instead of hitting on Glen; why not look at the topic at hand. Glen is either right, or he is wrong. Everything I have seen (with proof to back it up) indicates to me that Glen is dead on target.
Oh, BTW, Glen is not ‘right leaning’; he's a patriot who believes in the Constitution. Glen believes, as I do, that this is the greatest country on the earth, blessed by our Heavenly Father and is currently under attack by evil and self-serving agents of the Adversary (author of this mess included).Please point out the errors of Glen's ways, and the superiority of yours, if you can. Attacking Glen simply tells me that you have nothing intelligent to offer to the conversation, as the facts do not support your side of the debate. So, Danny-boy crawl back under the rock where you came from. Sit and complain to yourself and never question why you are living under a rock and Glen came from the bottom of the deep well of failure, and rose to stardom.
As a journalist, he needs to brush up on his writing technique. It’s very scattershot. I found it irritating that he kept leading up to a point, over and over, before finally making it.