Posted on 09/28/2009 9:05:34 PM PDT by jazusamo
Many people, including some conservatives, have been very impressed with how brainy the president and his advisers are. But that is not quite as reassuring as it might seem.
It was, after all, Franklin D. Roosevelt's brilliant "brains trust" advisers whose policies are now increasingly recognized as having prolonged the Great Depression of the 1930s, while claiming credit for ending it. The Great Depression ended only when the Second World War put an end to many New Deal policies.
FDR himself said that "Dr. New Deal" had been replaced by "Dr. Win-the-War." But those today who are for big spending like to credit wartime big spending for bringing the Great Depression to an end. They never ask the question as to why previous depressions had always ended on their own, much faster than the one under FDR, and without government intervention or massive government spending.
Brainy folks were also present in Lyndon Johnson's administration, especially in the Pentagon, where Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara's brilliant "whiz kids" tried to micro-manage the Vietnam war, with disastrous results.
There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs.
Such people have been told all their lives how brilliant they are, until finally they feel forced to admit it, with all due modesty. But they not only tend to over-estimate their own brilliance, more fundamentally they tend to over-estimate how important brilliance itself is when dealing with real world problems.
Many crucial things in life are learned from experience, rather than from clever thoughts or clever words. Indeed, a gift for the clever phrasing so much admired by the media can be a fatal talent, especially for someone chosen to lead a government.
Make no mistake about it, Adolf Hitler was brilliant. His underlying beliefs may have been half-baked and his hatreds overwhelming, but he was a genius when it came to carrying out his plans politically, based on those beliefs and hatreds.
Starting from a position of Germany's military weakness in the early 1930s, Hitler not only built up Germany's war-making potential, he did so in ways that minimized the danger that his potential victims would match his military build-up with their own. He said whatever soothing words they wanted to hear that would spare them the cost of military deterrence and the pain of contemplating another war.
He played some of the most highly educated people of his time for fools-- not only foreign political leaders but also members of the intelligentsia. The editor of The Times of London filtered out reports that his own foreign correspondents in Germany sent him about the evils and dangers of the Nazis. In the United States, W.E.B. Du Bois-- with a Ph.D. from Harvard-- said that dictatorship in Germany was "absolutely necessary to get the state in order."
In an age when facts seem to carry less weight than the visions of brilliant and charismatic leaders, it is more important than ever to look at the actual track records of those brilliant and charismatic leaders. After all, Hitler led Germany into military catastrophe and left much of the country in ruins.
Even in a country which suffered none of the wartime destruction that others suffered in the 20th century, Argentina began that century as one of the 10 richest nations in the world-- ahead of France and Germany-- and ended it as such an economic disaster that no one would even compare it to France or Germany.
Politically brilliant and charismatic leaders, promoting reckless government spending-- of whom Juan Peron was the most prominent, but by no means alone-- managed to create an economic disaster in a country with an abundance of natural resources and a country that was spared the stresses that wars inflicted on other nations in the 20th century.
Someone recently pointed out how much Barack Obama's style and strategies resemble those of Latin American charismatic despots-- the takeover of industries by demagogues who never ran a business, the rousing rhetoric of resentment addressed to the masses and the personal cult of the leader promoted by the media. But do we want to become the world's largest banana republic?
I agree on all your points, especially him being a fraud, he misrepresents most everything.
minor correction. Barack went to Columbia/Harvard; Michelle went to Princeton/Harvard.
Du Bois was also an ardent admirer of Josef Stalin. He passed away the very day that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. gave his famous "I Have A Dream" speech on the National Mall. Du Bois may have been one of the earliest leaders of the civil rights movement, but he had a definite blind spot for dictatorship.
He was sharp enough during the debates. Was there a teleprompter I didn’t see? Or did he get questions in advance?
I think it was Dr. Laura who said we don’t need more smart people, we need more good people. I never forgot that. Sowell makes the case. Gotta love this guy.
There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs.
guess that means we really are safe, cause for all the 'pedigree', bambam is dumb as owl sh!t...
'bocks orox' hussein aint fit to sharpen Dr Sowell's pencils...
What turned him so dull?
Was he on speed that night?
bump
Great graphic and true!
“Such people have been told all their lives how brilliant they are, until finally they feel forced to admit it, with all due modesty.”
Elitists who just “know” that they possess unique insight just can’t resist putting their abstract theories into practice, no matter what it takes. This is bound to end in disaster.
Successful leaders are those who base their decisions on empirical knowledge and practiced experience.
Abstract theories that seem to conflict with time honored experience occasionally succeed in the hard sciences, but almost always turn out to be wrong when applied to human affairs.
Thanks for the ping Jaz...Mr Sowell can really tell it like it is and if he keeps this up Newt may have to pass his Hammer to him...
He never really was.
Fixed it.
The Ivy/Oxbridge catechism, so unimaginatively regurgitated by Obama and company, boils down to two dull suppositions that the average middle-schooler could rebut:
1: Spend our way to prosperity
2: Talk nice to our enemies
The self-styled intellectual elite is made up not of creative thinkers, but stodgy conformists. Unfortunately for them, kissing up for grades brings rewards in school, but not in the real world.
We have a choice!
This was an exercise of our 1st amendment rights.
They don't want to see the exercise that comes after the 1st.
Agreed. Other than his being elected, I've seen no evidence of any special intelligence from Zero.
He’s not going anywhere for 8 years unless we take to the streets. Chatting away on FR will do little to nothing about the take over of America. Civil disorder on a daily basis is needed. Im afraid , like always , conservatives will sit and watch the ship sink.
A good point well expounded, Tom. You get another A-plus.
Such people have been told all their lives how brilliant they are, until finally they feel forced to admit it, with all due modesty. But they not only tend to over-estimate their own brilliance, more fundamentally they tend to over-estimate how important brilliance itself is when dealing with real world problems.
This link is to my article summarizing
- Why Don't Students Like School:
- A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions About How the Mind Works
and What It Means for the Classroom
by Daniel T. Willingham
The salient point is thatIntelligence can be changed through sustained hard work.This means that "intelligence" is not an intrinsic characteristic of a given person, but rather is significantly affected by how much that person has thought - and about what. The conclusion to be drawn from this is crucial:Always talk about successes and failures in terms of effort, not ability.Talking in terms of success due to effort leads to morale. Talking in terms of success due to effort leads to arrogance, reduced motivation to work, and, over time, an actual reduction in "IQ."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.