Posted on 09/28/2009 10:31:10 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
100 mile miss is a tad optomistic. Even a scud was more accurate than that. I would say they can hit close enough with their missiles, besides they have another type missile that has the same range as the Shahab-3. I am not sure what that is capable of.
Duh.
As someone WHO’S ACTUALLY MATED A NUCLEAR WARHEAD TO A MISSILE BODY, I’m not questioning that.
But, again, it ain’t a “nuclear missile” if there isn’t a nuclear warhead on board.
No, I won't bother. You're being obtuse, and nothing I could write would change that.
Go back to feeling cozy with Mahmoud Nukemadinijad.
Oh, DEFINITELY AGREED.
The MSM (main missile assembly) for the Lance (MGM-52) was the same, regardless of the warhead type. Very little difference in launch procedure, as the only changes were there to accomodate two-man control and nuclear surity.
The nuke warhead (W-70) was lighter, giving that variation much greater range.
Even a turd-world nation could ultimately create an initial nuke design capable of being duck-taped onto a Scud body.
Then I assume that you also want to bomb North Korea?
Everything you say is true and it scares me. The wrong people are in power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.