Yes, they are. Simple English as I wrote before.
As I have posted three times now,
Yes, I know of your love for cut and paste. Now try actually thinking for yourself instead of copying scientists who were either 1) wrong, or 2) talking theoretically in a way that you are misusing.
No, they are not. As I wrote before, there are no physical or observational differences between the geocentric model and the geokinetic model under GR according to Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis.
"Yes, I know of your love for cut and paste. Now try actually thinking for yourself instead of copying scientists who were either 1) wrong, or 2) talking theoretically in a way that you are misusing."
Saves lot of time when dealing with people who won't face reality. Their consistent comments about no physical or observational differences make it quite clear that they were not speaking theoretically.
If you want to claim that Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis are wrong about GR, go ahead. That's a 'winning' strategy, for sure. As far as I can tell, you just want to allude to the possibility while maintaining plausible deniability.