No, they are not. As I wrote before, there are no physical or observational differences between the geocentric model and the geokinetic model under GR according to Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis.
"Yes, I know of your love for cut and paste. Now try actually thinking for yourself instead of copying scientists who were either 1) wrong, or 2) talking theoretically in a way that you are misusing."
Saves lot of time when dealing with people who won't face reality. Their consistent comments about no physical or observational differences make it quite clear that they were not speaking theoretically.
If you want to claim that Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis are wrong about GR, go ahead. That's a 'winning' strategy, for sure. As far as I can tell, you just want to allude to the possibility while maintaining plausible deniability.
Reality? The Sun orbits the Earth in opposition to basic laws of physics? That’s not reality, that’s dreaming the Bible is scientifically correct and using any amount of tortured logic and misrepresentation of science in order to convince yourself that it’s true.
You can twist scientists all you want, but it won’t make the Sun orbit the Earth.
And you still haven’t given a clear answer as to whether you think the Earth is flat. A simple yes or no will do.