Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
Actually, you are wrong again. Coriolis and centrifugal forces arise naturally in a geocentric model. It is in the geokinetic model that these forces are fictional.

You have to make them up in the geocentric model. Please explain what causes the Coriolis in the geocentric model.

166 posted on 09/27/2009 7:22:22 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: ColdWater
"You have to make them up in the geocentric model. Please explain what causes the Coriolis in the geocentric model."

Wrong again. You have to make them up in the geokinetic model. This was posted yesterday morning. You are just blabbering.

"...Thus we may return to Ptolemy's point of view of a 'motionless earth'...One has to show that the transformed metric can be regarded as produced according to Einstein's field equations, by distant rotating masses. This has been done by Thirring. He calculated a field due to a rotating, hollow, thick-walled sphere and proved that inside the cavity it behaved as though there were centrifugal and other inertial forces usually attributed to absolute space. Thus from Einstein's point of view, Ptolemy and Copernicus are equally right."

Born, Max. "Einstein's Theory of Relativity",Dover Publications,1962, pgs 344 & 345:

168 posted on 09/27/2009 7:27:37 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson