Posted on 09/23/2009 9:55:57 AM PDT by Tiger_2009
Obama's Radicalism and the GOP Posted by Rocky Mountain Foundation on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 5:09:09 PM
Thank God John McCain lost in 2008. Obama's radical agenda will bring about the revitalization of the Republican party through grassroots citizen activism that would have been impossible under a McCain presidency.
By Tom Tancredo*
Eight months into the Obama presidency the Republican Party is suddenly thriving by virtue of the patriotic reawakening generated by Obamas radicalism. But the Republican revival may be short lived if it does not listen to the voice of the new citizen activists.
Obama was elected on the strength of Bush exhaustion syndrome and Obamas plausible promise of hope and change. But now that Obama has unveiled his truly radical agenda, middle class Americans are understandably alarmed.
Obamas radical program has provoked a grassroots rebellion of historic proportions. While the Republican Party may be one beneficiary of this rebellion, the rebellion itself has nothing to do with party allegiance or party organization. Indeed, some Republican elites feel as threatened by this new activism as Obama Democrats.
What is astounding and unprecedented in recent American politics is that this authentic citizen protest arose entirely outside of political party structures. Republican officials had virtually nothing to do with organizing the Tea Party protests that began in April or the town hall protests in August or the historic gathering of over one million people on the Capitol Mall on September 12.
Millions of Americans are seeing the radical, Marxist character of the Obama agenda for the first time. The attempted government takeover of health care, a crippling new energy tax, his affirmative action Supreme Court appointment, the World Apology Tour, the Justice Department attack on the CIA interrogation of terrorists, and now the abandonment of NATO allies on missile defense none of this was foretold in the platitudes of the 2008 election campaign. Obamas agenda is the fulfillment of the dreams and fantasies of the left wing of the Democrat Party, but our political and media elites were all taken by surprise. Obama is not the pragmatic centrist voters thought they were getting.
The unprecedented citizen activism that brought 1.5 million ordinary American to the Capitol Mall a week after the Labor Day holiday is in part a predictable reaction to Obamas radicalism, but it is also more than that. Something more profound is also at work. The fact that it has developed outside the established political structures is a story that has not yet been told because it does not fit the dominant narrative of American politics: genuine grassroots populism is supposed to always be from the left, not the right.
Obamas radical agenda is forcing the Republican Party to confront a fundamental issue it tries hard to avoid. Is the Republican Party going to seek compromise with Obamas radical agenda to prove they are committed to the same compassionate agenda, or will it provide leadership based on a different vision for America?
The sad truth is that this new activism, this rediscovery of constitutional limits on government and principled resistance to further expansion of entitlement spending, could never have emerged if John McCain had won the 2008 election. If John McCain had enshrined his anemic hands across the aisle pragmatism as the official language of the party of Lincoln and Reagan, the Republican Party would have continued its sorrowful drift.
What is most fascinating and encouraging and revolutionary about this mushrooming grassroots activism is that it is more than a reaction to Obamas radical program. It is more than just say no. It also a rediscovery and reaffirmation of the conservative principles that were abandoned or belittled by Republican Party elites in the Bush era.
The grassroots activism of the Tea Party rallies and 912 protests is almost the exact opposite of a traditional political rally organized by a candidate for public office. The purpose of these rallies is to save our country, not elect some candidate. In fact, there is often a large element of pox on both your houses in these protests, and Republican candidates who think they can run on traditional themes in 2010 without addressing these new challenges will have a rude awakening.
Yes, we all know that compromise is a necessary part of governance. But what the new citizen activists are demanding is that compromise be based on a constitutional, limited government, low-tax agenda. A little arsenic will kill you a little slower than a larger dose, but please dont serve it with a chocolate mousse and call it dessert.
What course the Republican Party will take at this crossroads is an open question. Old habits die hard. Just as George Bush was tone deaf on illegal immigration, many in the Republican Party leadership are loath to acknowledge that the mainstream media is in the pocket of the Democrat Party and new modes of communication and organization are needed. The hardest words for a Republican moderate to utter are, Rush Limbaugh was right.
But what is clear is that there is no going back to hands across the aisle bipartisanship that gave us McCain-Feingold and is too often a substitute for principled leadership. We do not need more snake oil of the no entitlement left behind variety. The day of reckoning for reckless government spending is at hand.
The Help (Desperately) Wanted sign is hanging in the window. Only leaders who can speak the language of liberty and limited government need apply.
To the point of supporting dopey libertarians and Romney backers.
I’m also not scared of answering questions. Seesh, frady cat.
Otherwise, you've made yourself very clear. Your preference is to have Obama-Biden running America. Not McCain-Palin. Gotcha.
Since we both live in Colorado, lets meet sometime face to face and see who is scared. How's that?
Hey, that would be great. In spite of our arguing here, we both are on the same side.
I live near Larkspur, south of Denver.
Btw, I'm in conservative Colorado Springs.
Are you saying you didn’t vote for Tancredo?
The real issue is, YOU accept the Beck/Tancredo belief that McCain-Palin would have been worse for America than Obama-Biden. You believe the Marxist is better than McCain and “Plugs” Biden offers a better leadership alternative than traditionalist and conservative, Sarah Palin.
Gotcha!
Well, I was (and will) going to address that next, but your assertion that we aren’t on the same side politically gave me pause.
Did you not vote for him?
I also live in Colorado's 5th Congressional District.
Still not sure sure why you think we aren’t on the same side.
What do you think of the 9/12 Project and National Tea Party (or give it any name you’d like) held in DC?
The TANK Tancredo. Will be Gov of Colorado?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.