Just as shiny ... almost as genuine!
Posted on 09/17/2009 12:20:33 PM PDT by broken_arrow1
“I have concerns about some of the language that is being used because I saw … I saw this myself in the late '70s in San Francisco,” Pelosi said, choking up and with tears forming in her eyes. “This kind of rhetoric is just, is really frightening and it created a climate in which we, violence took place and … I wish that we would all, again, curb our enthusiasm...
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
“Well, I think we all have to take responsibility for our actions and our words. The, uh, we are a free country and this balance between freedom and uh, uh, safety is one that we have to carefully uh, balance. Um, I have concerns about some of the language that is being used because I saw, I saw this myself, um, in the late 70’s in San Fransisco, this kind of, of, of uh, rhetoric was, was very frightening and it gave, it created a climate in which violence took place and, uh, so I wish that we would all again uh, curb our enthusiasm in some of the statements that are made so understanding that, that uh, some of the people, the ears that it is falling on are not as balanced as the person making the statement might assume. Uh, but again, uh, our country is great because people can say what they think and they believe. But I also think that they have to take responsibility for any incitement that they um, they may cause.”
Let’s carefully pick this apart, shall we?
First - “Well, I think we all have to take responsibility for our actions and our words.”
You first Pelosi!
Second - “The, uh, we are a free country and this balance between freedom and uh, uh, safety is one that we have to carefully uh, balance.”
Is this a veiled threat to shut up those that are exposing the corruption? What else are you going to compromise for OUR safety?
Third - “Um, I have concerns about some of the language that is being used...”
You don’t like to hear the truth spoken in public?
Fourth - “...because I saw, I saw this myself, um, in the late 70’s in San Fransisco, this kind of, of, of uh, rhetoric was, was very frightening and it gave, it created a climate in which violence took place...”
Wasn’t it the far left lunatic fringe, the commies, etc., that were spewing this vile language back then? Were you involved in any of this?
Fifth - “...and, uh, so I wish that we would all again uh, curb our enthusiasm in some of the statements that are made...”
Curb our enthusiasm for the truth? Should those screaming the truth from the rooftops sugar coat if for you? Or, would you prefer that they just shut up and go away?
Sixth - “...so understanding that, that uh, some of the people, the ears that it is falling on are not as balanced as the person making the statement might assume.”
So, Rush, Glenn, Mark, Neil, et al, are preaching to a bunch of nutballs that might just go off half-cocked and do something drastic? Like, maybe, uh, have a peaceful march on Washington to display their disapproval of the current regime?
Seventh - “Uh, but again, uh, our country is great because people can say what they think and they believe.”
So long as it is whispered in dark rooms and not on the nations airwaves. So long as it isn’t discussed amongst groups that might pass the truth on to others.
Eighth - “But I also think that they have to take responsibility for any incitement that they um, they may cause.”
Another veiled threat? Can you just come out and say it? You would like to see laws in place that would give you the ability to prosecute those that are giving us the truth to shut them up. Maybe even use RICO on them, should another group of a million people take to the streets in peaceful protest?
This is all a set up folks. They are slowly making their move. Don’t fall for this charade or these crocodile tears. She, and her ilk, are wolves, hungry, and just waiting for the right moment to pounce and devour.
I don't think there is such a thing yet. But I'm going to change that when I'm off the clock. Their propaganda is directional, in that it is organized toward specific ends. The when is pretty iffy, but I think a pattern can be established and a time frame proposed. They are that flagrant.
February 21, 1970 — Weathermen bombed the upper Manhattan home of Judge John Murtagh, who presided over a trial of Black Panthers. “Free the Panther 21; The Viet Cong Have Won; Kill the Pigs,” read graffiti on the Murtaughs’ sidewalk.
March 7, 1970 — Three Weathermen blew themselves up in a townhouse on Greenwich Village’s West 11th Street.
May 1970 — National Guard headquarters, in response to Kent State massacre
June 9, 1970 — New York Police Department headquarters, to oppose police repression
July 16, 1970 — San Francisco’s Presidio Army Base, to commemorate the 11th anniversary of the Cuban Revolution
October 8, 1970 — Queens Courthouse, New York City, to show sympathy with Empire State prison uprisings
October 8, 1970 — Harvard Center for International Affairs, to protest the Vietnam War
March 1, 1971 — The U.S. Capitol, to protest America’s invasion of Laos. A related five-page missive read: “We have attacked the Capitol because it is a monument to U.S. domination over the planet.” Code-named “the Big Top,” this attack’s $300,000 in damage equals $1.62 million in 2008 dollars.
August 27, 1971 — California State Corrections Department office in San Francisco’s Ferry Building, in response to the shooting death of prison activist George Jackson as he tried to escape San Quentin penitentiary
September 17, 1971 — New York Department of Corrections office, in solidarity with 29 inmates killed at Attica State Prison
May 19, 1972 — The Pentagon, to celebrate Ho Chi Minh’s birthday
May 18, 1973 — New York’s 103rd Precinct House, to retaliate against the NYPD’s killing of a 10-year-old black boy
September 28, 1973 — ITT headquarters in Manhattan, in response to the US-backed coup d’etat in Chile
March 6, 1974 — San Francisco offices of the Department of Health Education and Welfare, to criticize the forced sterilization of poor women
May 31, 1974 — California Attorney General’s office, after the shootout deaths of six members of the Symbionese Liberation Army, best known for kidnapping publishing heiress Patricia Randolph Hearst
June 17, 1974 — Gulf Oil’s Pittsburgh headquarters to object to its work in Angola
January 28, 1975 — U.S. State Department, to protest American policy in Vietnam. The bomb damaged 20 offices on three separate floors.
June 16, 1975 — New York’s Banco de Ponce, in sympathy with a Puerto Rican cement workers’ strike.
SOURCE: http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/select_weathermen.html
Screw Nancy Pelosi and her comrades in crime and condescension.
Ain’t gonna happen. They lost their momentum. The common man is ready for them. There is not a scenario that they could conceive and execute that would allow them to confiscate our weapons. Contrary to some opinions on FR, there are MANY in law enforcement as well who see how bankrupt the current leadership is. Who would come and take your guns? No one, that’s who. That is where the blood bath would be: ‘knock-knock. We’re here to collect your... BANG!
I suspect this is code for informing theOne and only O’s brownshirts to get busy.......
Pelosi must still be bleeding. PMS.
What a Whacko?
It is amazing the level of incompetence in their leadership.
Have they reached the bottom of the barrel yet?
“There will be blood” Is this a threat?”
Sounds like it...or maybe she hasn’t had her hysterectomy yet.
The key to them NOT trying to confiscate weapons is that they know that they “can’t get them all in one night”.
The word gets out, and the next night, things get REALLY nasty for those attempting confiscation.
I read NP’s “episode” with a lot of concern. The left desparately wants to quiesce all open debate (disagreement with their policies). If she can fabricate a “safety” concern, then she may be able to get the votes to “dial-down” freedom of speech.
The left will claim FOX, Rush, etc, etc, etc (basically anyone with a brain who is not part of the MSM) are “feeding” the “safety problem” ... then they will attempt “PC Speech” laws or other constraints (or monitoring) of our freedoms.
She doesn’t like what she “hears” she says ... the real question is, who was she listening to? If could not have been FOX ...
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”
- Thomas Jefferson.
Pelosi, you and your ilk are ensuring that bloodshed will occur, you have turned your backs on the priciples that founded this nation, and are riling a beast that tossed off the chains of the worlds mightiest nation to become the mightiest nation herself. Politicians feel they can be tyranical without fear or consequence, and they are going to learn that they may not.
Glenn is going to have soooooooooooo much fun with this one tomorrow!
and this is the bit*h that started the nasty rhetoric.
She should be drawn and quartered.
good, I want the libs frightened
I am convinced this woman is nuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.