“I looked at your COLB “facts”, and they’ve all been debunked long ago.”
No kidding? Which ones?
Says who? This is simply an unsupported asertion. Whoever filled out the document could have put whatever they wanted.
"The COLB is also cropped in many of the pictures that claim it is a scan. If it is a scan, why not leave the document and size intact?"
You refer only to the scanned copy. Why people choose to crop is irrelevant to the issue. It doesn't matter and hardly is evidence of anything. More importantly, questions about the scans are not questions about the document. There are also photographs of the document being held and examined.
"The COLB also has no artifacts such paper folds. A scan does not make those disappear and in fact will highlight them."
Wrong on both counts. A scanner tends to make images without shadows, which minimizes folds and seals. And the folds and seal are on the scanned image. But again, you only talk about the scan and not the photos.
"The COLB that is scanned mysteriously does not show the Seal of Hawaii. Why? Because it was computer generated and not scanned."
See above. The seal is on the scanned image.
"More over, many of us are concerned and want to know why he wasted time producing a document that is inconsistent with what we know a Birth Certificate looks like."
HE didn't produce it. The State of Hawaii did. And it is completely consistent with the document Hawaii produces when ones requests their birth certificate from them.