Says who? This is simply an unsupported asertion. Whoever filled out the document could have put whatever they wanted.
"The COLB is also cropped in many of the pictures that claim it is a scan. If it is a scan, why not leave the document and size intact?"
You refer only to the scanned copy. Why people choose to crop is irrelevant to the issue. It doesn't matter and hardly is evidence of anything. More importantly, questions about the scans are not questions about the document. There are also photographs of the document being held and examined.
"The COLB also has no artifacts such paper folds. A scan does not make those disappear and in fact will highlight them."
Wrong on both counts. A scanner tends to make images without shadows, which minimizes folds and seals. And the folds and seal are on the scanned image. But again, you only talk about the scan and not the photos.
"The COLB that is scanned mysteriously does not show the Seal of Hawaii. Why? Because it was computer generated and not scanned."
See above. The seal is on the scanned image.
"More over, many of us are concerned and want to know why he wasted time producing a document that is inconsistent with what we know a Birth Certificate looks like."
HE didn't produce it. The State of Hawaii did. And it is completely consistent with the document Hawaii produces when ones requests their birth certificate from them.
dude, you are such an obvious fraud. Picking and choosing the questions to answer and parsimoniously at that.
I am in the middle of a workout so I will get back to you in a while.
However it obvious you do not scan very many documents. I scan hundreds of pages a week and it doesn’t seem to matter if I use my fancy schmancie one or the cheap one. They both produce artifacts and show folds. Oh! and I sold MFP’s for while so I a. pretty sure I know what I am talking about.
I only had to answer stupid questions from customers about artifacts and made it real clear. the scanner is going to reproduce what is there.
The only way you can make artifacts go away is to paint brush them.
Then you don’t address why Barry O. doesn’t just present a Birth Certificate but profer the State of Hawaii did? Lame, Lame, Lame!
On who’s request did Hawaii act upon? They didn’t do it without Barry asking for it. IF HE DID.
The state of Hawaii never, ever said they produced one for Barry. feel free to show where they say it but moreover tell me what the motivation was to present a COLB when he already has three Birth Certificates. He must still have the one he waxed on about in his book.
It seemed pretty darn important then.
You can’t even bring yourself to ask the questions.
You only come to these “Birther” stories to undermine with what?
Psychofantastic non-answers?