To: ClearCase_guy
What can the bus driver do though? If he touches the kids then well, he’s got trouble.
24 posted on
09/15/2009 5:33:28 AM PDT by
misterrob
(A society that burdens future generations with debt can not be considered moral or just)
To: misterrob
He has trouble anyway. It’s his bus. He’s the first one that gets blamed.
If you live on a volcano, don’t be surprised if you see lava.
26 posted on
09/15/2009 5:36:36 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: misterrob
It's not really about the bus driver getting into trouble for touching the kids. That is a concern but the biggest reason the bus driver does not intervene is because if they leave their seat, there is a risk that another student could mess with the controls and cause a serious accident while the driver is at the back of the bus or off the bus dealing with other students.
That's why the cameras are on the bus now. They are for "after the fact" whodunit legal wrangling. About the only thing the driver is able to do without risk of getting fired is call the police and wait on the side of the road for them to arrive and board the bus.
44 posted on
09/15/2009 6:05:37 AM PDT by
TNdandelion
(I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
To: misterrob
I’ll tell you what... when I was in school, if that happened on my bus, the bus driver would have beat the hell out of the students involved. You did NOT do that crap on the bus, period. They laid down the law and we followed it. Period. Now, they’re afraid of lawsuits so they do nothing. I say, arm the bus drivers with tasers.
93 posted on
09/15/2009 6:55:35 PM PDT by
rintense
(Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson