I looked up the MD law. It pertains to:
“wire, oral, or electronic communication”
A videotape is obviously not a wire communication. It’s not electronic. So the question is whether “oral communication” includes videotape.
Whatever, this is so stupid. They would never get a conviction.
Obviously the inept states attorney is as stupid as the Acorn pigs.
It would make sense that it did in this case. They were certainly communicating orally.