Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob Eimiller

I looked up the MD law. It pertains to:

“wire, oral, or electronic communication”

A videotape is obviously not a wire communication. It’s not electronic. So the question is whether “oral communication” includes videotape.

Whatever, this is so stupid. They would never get a conviction.


58 posted on 09/12/2009 9:19:48 PM PDT by freespirited (Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited

Obviously the inept states attorney is as stupid as the Acorn pigs.


65 posted on 09/12/2009 9:24:24 PM PDT by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
So the question is whether “oral communication” includes videotape.

It would make sense that it did in this case. They were certainly communicating orally.

75 posted on 09/12/2009 9:46:56 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson