Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NurdlyPeon

I agree, since they are still talking about the birth of Christ, they are clearly changing it so as to be a clear and knowing insult to Christianity.

I can think of no reasonable reason to change the wording, without changing anything else, just so they can eliminate the word Christ.


5 posted on 09/12/2009 7:33:42 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog

Biblical scholars agree that Christ wasn’t born and didn’t die in 1 AD, so that’s the “official” reason for the whole BCE/CE thing.

But, we all know that the real reason is anti-Christianity. If they could, they’d switch us over to the muslim calendar (if there is such a thing—and I don’t care enough to Google it).

I asked a BCE/CE advocate what happened in 1 CE to force the change in calendars. Like most liberals, he didn’t know why he supports something. He just knows that the talking head on the TV box told him to!


7 posted on 09/12/2009 7:50:05 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Question O-thority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson