Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog

Biblical scholars agree that Christ wasn’t born and didn’t die in 1 AD, so that’s the “official” reason for the whole BCE/CE thing.

But, we all know that the real reason is anti-Christianity. If they could, they’d switch us over to the muslim calendar (if there is such a thing—and I don’t care enough to Google it).

I asked a BCE/CE advocate what happened in 1 CE to force the change in calendars. Like most liberals, he didn’t know why he supports something. He just knows that the talking head on the TV box told him to!


7 posted on 09/12/2009 7:50:05 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Question O-thority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Bryanw92
There is a Muslim calendar which starts in A.D. 622 (the Hegira, or Muhammad's flight from Mecca to Medina), but since the Muslim year is about 11 days shorter than a solar year, it wouldn't be very practical to use.

Since they are talking about a synagogue from the early Roman period, why not use Roman dates? "A.U.C. 700 to 900" (counting from the founding of Rome in 753 B.C.). Or use Olympiads and get everyone totally confused.

17 posted on 09/12/2009 10:19:32 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson