As far as EV's accuracy and sources, I will let him speak for himself, but his sources are impeccable, WRT the California case... I do not believe his answer was referring to the Georgia case, but rather to the supposition that full discovery had been granted in the California case.
WRT the documents in the CA. case, they seem to allow limited discovery, only for the purpose of defending against the motion to dismiss, which is relatively useless for the purposes desired hereon... So the Oct. 5th "Motion to Dismiss" argument still must be overcome before real discovery is granted... Although, IANAL, so my interpretation could be mistaken.
Upon reading through all the documents posted myself, I see that EV was indeed right, and there was no motion passed for “immediate expedited discovery”. The motion regarding discovery was handed over to a magistrate and will be decided next Monday — if I understood it all correctly. I’m not a lawyer, either. :)
Thanks.