[Hypo]

no spelling typo, there is an omission. Here are the documents, the 1st has the Constitutional Eligibility sentence, the 2nd does not, but has the received stamp. I'll also include McCain/Palin's But the big question is who would Notarize both on the same day, if they noticed the difference, and they must have.

[Faith]

I understand that the omission of the Constitutional eligibility statement was the major difference in the two documents and that it was obviously purposeful. The article also discussed the “typo” which is seen in the date of the Convention: August 25 “though” 28, 2008.

[DocRock]

document bookmark