Skip to comments.
Birthers Get Their Day in Court – Obama Must Now Prove His Citizenship
examiner.com ^
| September 9, 2009
| Kimberly Dvorak
Posted on 09/10/2009 4:54:47 AM PDT by kellynla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-315 next last
1
posted on
09/10/2009 4:54:48 AM PDT
by
kellynla
To: kellynla
Sweet!
Let the forgeries begin. (again)
2
posted on
09/10/2009 4:58:55 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: kellynla
Can’t be said enough: This is hugh!
3
posted on
09/10/2009 4:59:20 AM PDT
by
Road Warrior ‘04
(I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! The "other" Jim Thompson)
To: kellynla
He (the judge) is determined to get Obama to prove he is eligible, Schwilk explained. Things are going to move very fast. This won't go anywhere.Some higher court will put a stop to it.
To: kellynla
To: kellynla
His lawyers will attempt to derail the discovery portion, ideally that will be most likely in the form of some manufactured "National Emergency"!
Call me cynical
6
posted on
09/10/2009 5:00:28 AM PDT
by
SERE_DOC
(My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons! How does one clean a phase 4 plasma rifle)
To: kellynla
Judge Carter was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1998.
7
posted on
09/10/2009 5:02:23 AM PDT
by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: kellynla
Should be interesting. Dont get your hopes up to high.
8
posted on
09/10/2009 5:03:27 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
To: kellynla
Judge: “President Obama, show the court proof you are eligible.”
Obama: “No.”
Then what?
9
posted on
09/10/2009 5:04:01 AM PDT
by
IamConservative
(I'll keep my money. You keep the change.)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: wolfcreek
One big clue would be to turn the document over and see where it was made...
Made in Kenya
Made in China (they bought it in WalMart)
If it has some invisible ink, then it is probably a clue that will lead you to another clue, to another clue...You know the drill...
Thats kinda what they want to have happen now...
To: kellynla
I had to look at the source to see if the first two sentences were written as shown above. It is unbelievable that such poor writing would appear in a major newspaper. Ugh.
To: F15Eagle
Or Barrys shell game will put us into a gigantic Constitutional crisis. I was pondering this earlier. What happens if he IS found to be a fraud? Does that reset everything back to 19 Jan 2009? All laws, all Supreme Court assignments, all AGs? Is there any jurisprudence on this? Any legal FReepers?
13
posted on
09/10/2009 5:08:19 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(Confutatis maledictis, voca me cum benedictis)
To: kellynla
I think this issue is moot. With a Supreme Court that's unwilling to entertain the argument and a Democratically controlled Congress and Senate, there's no way it will result in anything. Even if the President fails to provide proof, there's nothing the judge can do to him because of executive privilege. If they could prove he's not legal it would take an impeachment to remove him and that's not going to happen.
14
posted on
09/10/2009 5:09:02 AM PDT
by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: kellynla
Hmmmm, let’s see, in about a year and three months, they will find the birth certificate on an upstairs table at the White House.
To: rarestia
What happens if he IS found to be a fraud? Watts riots times 100!
To: wolfcreek
Not going to happen. We have jurisdiction and separation of powers arguments that will take years to get through before some CA judge gets to haul the President of the United States into court.
17
posted on
09/10/2009 5:13:05 AM PDT
by
dblshot
To: kellynla
The Obama strategy will be quite simple. Prove nothing. Provide nothing. Lose. Appeal. Win.
To: IamConservative
Judge: President Obama, show the court proof you are eligible. Obama: No.
Then what?
Technically, a failure to provide the required information would be a legal admission of the claim against him. More likely, the court would grant full discovery to the plaintiffs, including a court order to the state of Hawaii to disclose the "long form" birth certificate to the plaintiffs.
That is, assuming it ever gets that far. Which, given the way this has unfolded before, is very unlikely.
19
posted on
09/10/2009 5:16:09 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(Obama's Waterloo: a "hockey mom" with a laptop and a Facebook account)
To: IamConservative
Contempt of court.
Judge declares plaintiffs win by default, and president is considered unqualified.
Military has reasonable cause and duty to stand down until situation changes.
20
posted on
09/10/2009 5:16:23 AM PDT
by
PA-RIVER
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-315 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson