Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Allows Obama Eligibility Case to Go Forward (Where R the FReeper "Dimissal Missies?")
sonorannews.com ^ | September 9, 2009 | Linda Bentley

Posted on 09/09/2009 8:57:44 PM PDT by kellynla

SANTA ANA, Calif. – On Sept. 8, U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter ordered a scheduling conference for Oct. 5, 2009, allowing the Obama eligibility case filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. on behalf Captain Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes and others to proceed.

Carter wrote, “The responsibility for the progress of litigation in the federal courts falls not only upon attorneys in the action, but upon the court as well. Accordingly, the court issues this order.”

Taitz filed a declaration of Lucas Daniel Smith with an exhibit on Friday.

Smith, a 29-year-old American citizen from Iowa, signed an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, stating he “traveled to Kenya and Mombasa, in particular, with the intent to obtain the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama,” as he was told previously it was on file in the hospital and under seal, due to the fact the Kenyan Prime Minister is Obama’s cousin.

Smith states he visited Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya on Feb. 19, 2009, accompanied by a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, and said he had to pay a cash “consideration” to a Kenyan military officer on duty to look the other way while he obtained the copy of the birth certificate.

According to Smith, the copy was signed by the hospital administrator and contains the embossed seal. As an exhibit, Smith provided the “true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained.”

Meanwhile, defendants filed a motion to dismiss stating, “Plaintiffs ask this Court to entertain a challenge to the 2008 election of President Barack Obama by requiring the President to disprove, in this Court, their innuendo alleging that he is not a ‘natural born citizen’ within the meaning of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs cannot use this Court to investigate and decide the President’s fitness for office or their related claims …

“Plaintiffs also seek to litigate in this court a variety of vaguely-defined claims purportedly related to a hodgepodge of constitutional provisions, civil and criminal statutes, and the Freedom of Information Act. These claims are equally flawed ...”

Jeff Schwilk, founder, San Diego Minutemen, attended the Sept. 8 hearing and reported back, “Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama's request for dismissal today, instead setting a hearing date for Oct. 5. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama's motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner.

According to Schwilk, Carter, a former U.S. Marine, repeated several times that this case is very serious and must be resolved quickly so that the troops know their Commander in Chief is eligible to hold that position and issue lawful orders to our military in this time of war.

“Plaintiffs’ Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz did a great job, winning some huge victories today,” said Schwilk, adding, “She was fearless!”

Carter requested all counsel familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California in order “to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.”

Carter admonished counsel that a continuance of a scheduling conference is rarely granted and a continuance will only be granted only for good cause.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last
To: Boiler Plate
If the case goes forward, I’m betting that Obama will simply ignore the court’s order to produce the birth certificate.

He would not be ordered to produce it, heaven forbid. No the State of Hawaii's Vital Statistics office would be so ordered, as their law provides. Barry would not be involved.

21 posted on 09/09/2009 9:15:22 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

“But...Could Obama appeal?”

No.
If the judge does not dismiss the case and allows discovery, bam can’t do squat.


22 posted on 09/09/2009 9:16:41 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
(Where R the FReeper "Dimissal Missies?")

They are moving the goal posts...again. :-)

23 posted on 09/09/2009 9:16:41 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Septemeber/September.
I am sooo tired.


24 posted on 09/09/2009 9:17:45 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
If the case goes forward, I’m betting that Obama will simply ignore the court’s order to produce the birth certificate.

That will be the State of Hawaii not Obama.

25 posted on 09/09/2009 9:19:14 PM PDT by cpdiii (roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Obama will claim Executive Privilege and use his newly minted Executive Order to keep the records sealed until they are lost or misplaced. In any case I do not expect the birth certificate to appear.
Obama will appeal all the way up, while all the time delaying and obstructing till he either finishes his term or he can get the Constitution amended retroactively.
26 posted on 09/09/2009 9:20:36 PM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Here is a transcript of the court order.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19547072/03118728478


27 posted on 09/09/2009 9:23:40 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I hope so, but I’m going Missouri on it.


28 posted on 09/09/2009 9:23:51 PM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
If the case goes forward, I’m betting that Obama will simply ignore the court’s order to produce the birth certificate.

Will the Hawaiian Department of Health do the same? How about Obama's admission documents from his Hawaiian school Punahou or Occidental College?

How about when the judge sends over the US Marshals to enforce the court order(s)?

29 posted on 09/09/2009 9:24:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Just ran across this article and thought to post it to FR myself. You beat me to it, Kellynla! Great read. Exciting news. Hope it follows a natural and just progression. I truly hope this Smith fellow is legit.


30 posted on 09/09/2009 9:25:55 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
This is what others said who were at the hearing and I hope it is accurate. Finally - someone in the judiciary who understands the needs of our brave troops who are being JERKED around with BS rules of engagement (ROE) ordered by the Kenyan.

I hope Scwilk and others have not embellished about Judge Carter implying that dismissal is very very remote. Any legal beagles care to comment. I would guess a judge would have a hearing on the dismissal then a later hearing on discovery. I get the impression though I may be wrong that Judge Carter is saying show up on Oct 5(?) for the hearing on the dismissal (which he will wave away) and let's get down to business with discovery. Discovery meaning it is time for obama to pony up his BC among other docs. I get the impression that if Judge Carter does not see proof that O is natural born or born in America that he will rule he is ineligible. It appears the Judge already "gets it" on how an AMERICAN is eligble and ineligible to be TOTUS.

31 posted on 09/09/2009 9:26:10 PM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
>Where are all you FReepers who bet me that this case would be “Dismissed”

Fair enough! I'll eat
a little crow, now. I think
it will still get tossed.

32 posted on 09/09/2009 9:27:38 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
If the case goes forward, I’m betting that Obama will simply ignore the court’s order to produce the birth certificate.

It will amount to pleading guilty because the other side properly presented their evidence and it was not refuted. Preponderance of evidence will be on plaintiffs' side.

If that happens probably there will be no open revolt, but after listening one-on-one to a hundred important people in the country the President will have no options left but to resign.

So, IMO, if this case is not dismissed *and* if Obama has nothing to show then most likely the necessary documents will be conveniently found in archives and the FBI lab will vouch for their authenticity.

33 posted on 09/09/2009 9:28:24 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
“I think it will still get tossed.”

Well you are obviously not familiar with Judge Carter.

But I will be happy to put you on my “Steak Dinner Winner” list. BIG SMILE

My fellow Marine, Judge Carter, who also served in Viet Nam & also received a Purple Heart is gonna get to the bottom of this issue...come hell or high water!
Point, Game, Set, Match!

Semper Fi,
Kelly

34 posted on 09/09/2009 9:34:03 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate

this is the baffling idea ..... the judge gets the docs from the source, not from the defendant.

The other baffling concept: that the courts will find the authority to remove Obambi from office.


35 posted on 09/09/2009 9:36:14 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

There is the attorney with a AB, BS, JD and PhD from Harvard who writes a web column. I forget his name but he was on Plains Radio a few times. He is big on getting rid of the Fed. Dr. Edwin Viera I think.

His analysis is The Joint Chiefs of Staff may have to send the military over to remove Hussein.

I view Judge Carter as the little boy in the Emperor Has No Clothes. No judge has had the guts to speak out. Carter, it appears, sees it as a cut and dry case like a traffic ticket or landlord dispute. Let’s see the evidence and I will make my ruling.

“Oh and by the way I take this very seriously because our troops are involved.”

This is NOT a man who will rule that our troops have “no standing.”


36 posted on 09/09/2009 9:36:40 PM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: so_real
I truly hope this Smith fellow is legit.

He has more credibility than Obama does.

Smith went to the Federal Court in CA to be deposed about Obama's Kenyan birth certificate, and made himself available to answer questions to the general public.

Smith's Obama birth certificate has been entered as evidence. Where is the Obama Certification of Live Birth that Crissy Mathews waved to his audience and O'Reilly said say Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. Hmmmmmmmmm?

Pssssssst, it's nowhere to be seen in court. LoL!

Here he is outside the court house Tuesday.

Oh, looky, he has it in his hand.

37 posted on 09/09/2009 9:38:24 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

It is my understanding the judge denied the motion to dismiss


38 posted on 09/09/2009 9:40:44 PM PDT by humble and shy (Taking our country back, one politician at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

It isn’t clear at all what the plaintiff’s are asking the court to do? Remove the Obama California ELECTORS who have already cast their votes? Invalidate the California vote result?

In any event, the DEMS have a serious problem.


39 posted on 09/09/2009 9:43:47 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate

I’m pretty sure he can’t use Executive Privilege because he was not president at the time of birth. The way I read the Executive Order, there is no mention that if the Court orders the documents he doesn’t have to comply. They can fle appeals if they want. The appeals can be denied or thrown out. Please don’t rain on my parade. :-)


40 posted on 09/09/2009 9:44:01 PM PDT by humble and shy (Taking our country back, one politician at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson