I'm not the one who posted a list of Catholic "errors" and "sins." Your boy did a fine job of dividing Catholics from Christians all by himself.
Wrong. Cott Shop was responding to Buck W.’s extended multi-reply diatribe about how Catholics are the “real” Christians, whereas bible-believing creationists are supposedly “phony” (all the while refusing to profess Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior, or to answer the question as to whether he is even Catholic!).
[[I’m not the one who posted a list of Catholic “errors” and “sins.” Your boy did a fine job of dividing Catholics from Christians all by himself.]]
See that’s your problem- you DO NOT LISTEN- I never seperated ‘catholics from Christians’ I seperated Catholic Doctrine from bible beleiving Doctrine- there are indeed SOME Catholics that HAVe Accepted Christ as savior, and aren’t tryign to ‘work their way to heaven’ but who none-the-less may be confused abotu certain doctrinal issues thanks to the church that has added to hte bible- but a good many catholics put htier trust in their own abilities thinkign they are earnign salvation, or that they were ‘saved when they were baptized as infants, and htis is NOT biblical as pointed out i nthe link I provided- infants can NOT confess their sins and acvcept Chrisrt as God specifically pointed out one MUST do in order to be saved, an relying on infant baptism for ‘salvation’ is a sure-fire way to miss hte mark- not sure why hte church insists on keeping htis error alive, but they do- oh well- Buck asked, I answered, but apparently, the messenger, once again, is the one that is goign to be villified- just like Van Jones and the White house have doen to Glen Beck- oh well-