Skip to comments.
Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue
WND ^
| 9/8/09
| staff
Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 861-871 next last
To: pissant
To: afnamvet
No, I do not agree to speculation. It is your opinion, not mine.
+++++++++++++++++
I wish I didn’t have to speculate on any of this. Perhaps you’re referring only and specifically to speculating about Judge Carter. Yeah, I hope he’s the exception of an honorable Democrat or an honorable independent - or whatever he claims to be..
682
posted on
09/09/2009 11:49:55 AM PDT
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try TRAITORS.))
To: Non-Sequitur
good parry but not as credible as your perverse pleasure in highlighting negative turns rather than progress designates
683
posted on
09/09/2009 11:51:38 AM PDT
by
FARS
( Be happy, Be well)
To: MHGinTN
Yes, but if a judge orders Hawaii to produce, Hawaii can say “Stick it, we only answer to Hawiian courts”.
I think he will order Hussein to provide the documents, and corner him.
To: MHGinTN
You asked, If this Judge orders documents released from Hawaii, Will Hussein refuse to comply with the order? If Judge Carter sends a court order for the HI Vital Records, the Obammy will not be in the loop. He cannot refuse when it is HI being subpoenaed.
+++++++++++++++
In which case this may finally be spinning out of control to the puppet masters of the WH. If this is finally revealed, it will also send strong signals to any other feaux candidate for the POTUS, which is one of the biggest reasons that any of us on the BC, NBC, school transcript side, have pursued this issue - for our posterity and the integrity of the US Constitution and the office of the President of the United States.
I really would like to see a SCOTUS ruling on what NBC is in the USC.
685
posted on
09/09/2009 11:54:11 AM PDT
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try TRAITORS.))
To: mkjessup; ~Kim4VRWC's~
I for one appreciate your slamdowns of NS. He asks for it, and you deliver. It’s a beautiful thing imo.
686
posted on
09/09/2009 11:55:05 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: Sibre Fan
Everything filed to date in the case by the appellees in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, under the signatures of Robert Bauer and kate Ellen Andrias of Perkins Coie also bears the signature of R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U. S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney;s Office (USA) Appellate Division, Civil Unit, 555 4th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20530. Why do you think your pals in the White House are not more open about this appearance?
687
posted on
09/09/2009 11:55:20 AM PDT
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: Bob from Fairfield
689
posted on
09/09/2009 12:00:43 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: PA-RIVER
No, provenance cannot be guaranteed by ordering Obammy to produce the documentation. Contrary to NS's claim that an Internet image cannot be deemed a fraud, the first exhibit Hussein tried to post as his proof of eligibility was clewarly a fradu since it lack a rasied seal, which when questioned he had added to the first fraud and then re-exhibited on the Internet. There are telltale markers which show the first was altered to create the second fraud, but I sure am not revealing the markers here.
The third exhibit Obammy allowed Factcheck to photograph and handle was not the same exhibit used the first and second frauds because it lacked the markers in the first and second frauds. Authenticity is still in question, and anyone who tries to convince you that the effort to use fraudulent exhibits from the start has no bearing on the questioning of provenance of the handled exhibit is blowing smoke up your leg to put you off the trail.
We've has another obamanoid named WOSG trying to float that little deceit, even goning so far as to tell us that we should ignore the first fraudulent exhibits and focus solely on the third exhibit.
690
posted on
09/09/2009 12:01:53 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: GizmosAndGadgets
The son of FMD said that FMD and Helen Canfield Davis were listed as parents on his birth certificate. I thought that was an odd way to say who his parents were.. Does he look like Obama
To: FARS
good parry but not as credible as your perverse pleasure in highlighting negative turns rather than progress designates I don't see the progress that you do. This case is proceeding slowly but surely, one step at a time. The next hurdle for Taitz is the motion to dismiss, and that should be settled on October 5th or shortly after. And while I don't really expect it to survive that, I kind of wish it would go to trial if for no other reason than to see Taitz perform in an actual courtroom in an actual trial.
To: Non-Sequitur
So you would prefer she drop the case and let you handle it?
At least she has carried the ball at her own expense - in many ways - to where it now has a chance of getting the Defense to have to show some documents.
The blocking of discovery motion as Sibre Fan crows about as a negative, has not been granted. Obamabots are trying their best to derail anything they can.
I wonder if Kreep is as straightforward as he claims and not runing interference.
You might both ant to hold back on MOnday morning quarterbacking and rooting for the opposing team
693
posted on
09/09/2009 12:37:00 PM PDT
by
FARS
( Be happy, Be well)
To: MHGinTN
Game, Set, Match???
If the judge Orders the Long form and all companion documents from Hussein, that exist in the Hawaiian state files, and Hussein fails to comply, then the Plaintiff wins by Default.
Then it goes to the next appeals court that will probably want to help Hussein. But the peril is, it gets bigger legs.
To: MHGinTN; mkjessup; Jim Robinson; mojitojoe; FARS; RummyChick; Kevmo; danamco; moder_ator; ...
Non-Sequitur has said many times that he enjoys causing arguments with fellow FReepers and that he comes to the Civil War and BC threads to call people names and fight. Dissension is not a bad thing, but staying on FR because you get your jollies from fighting and flooding threads where other FReepers are doing serious investigating is not fair and should be addressed by the mods and owners. NS is a very slick, but very obvious Obama fan.
695
posted on
09/09/2009 12:56:03 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: Non-Sequitur; MHGinTN
I sent you the link, did you donate to FR? or are you here just to use the site for your own benefit?
696
posted on
09/09/2009 12:57:20 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: Non-Sequitur
Oh I don't know about that, I've been hitting the bullseye on your lying ass with pretty good accuracy.
So you would like to believe.
Go back and read the thread, I've been kicking your ass up one side and down the other, and most of that was easily done just by quoting your own puerile sputterings, i.e., as Pogo might say "you has met the enemy, and he is you", lol
697
posted on
09/09/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
(You're either with the Constitution, or you're with the Liars, Enablers & that EmEFin 0bama! CHOOSE!)
To: BP2
Perfection, sheer perfection. I hope you sent that to the mods and Jim.
698
posted on
09/09/2009 12:59:48 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: Non-Sequitur
YES you are and your past posts are being copied one by one, and will be sent to JR
699
posted on
09/09/2009 1:03:14 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: little jeremiah
I for one appreciate your slamdowns of NS. He asks for it, and you deliver. Its a beautiful thing imo.
It's kinda like one of those old games of 'Whack-A-Mole' except in this case, the mole is a little less creative.
700
posted on
09/09/2009 1:04:11 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
(You're either with the Constitution, or you're with the Liars, Enablers & that EmEFin 0bama! CHOOSE!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 861-871 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson