If all you can resort to is argumentative fallacy, instead of standing on the fundamental principles of individual liberty which our Constitution represents, then there’s certainly no point in trying to reason with you.
I do believe in the fundamental principles of individual liberty enshrined in the US Constitution. I just don’t think you and I see those fundamental principles the same way. However, you’re certainly entitled to try and convince people they should legalize crystal meth and 155mm howitzers, but I’m not holding my breath.
There are things today that the founders never considered, such as nuclear bombs and chemical weapons. Would they consider those things protected by the 2nd Amendment? I have my doubts.
Unfortunately, it appears we are at an impasse. No amount of discussion is going to convince me to support total legalization of all weaponry and drugs. Nor does it appear I’m getting through to you (to support my perspective). Have a great day!