Could you make it a smaller size and/or not all caps, please?
I thought a military lady doctor filed a case in Texas courts? A class action suit with thousands of active duty John & Jane Doe soldiers is what is needed.
They also need an experienced attorney running the case - not Orly. She is a good lady but they need a attorney with trial experience.
I thought a military lady doctor filed a case in Texas courts? A class action suit with thousands of active duty John & Jane Doe soldiers is what is needed.
They also need an experienced attorney running the case - not Orly. She is a good lady but they need a attorney with trial experience.
This ain’t activism.
BUMP. A class action by Military members and vets would be excellent news
Appendix M CJCS Deployment Preparation Orders, Deployment Orders, and Redeployment Orders1. Purpose. A DEPLOYMENT PREPARATION ORDER or DEPLOYMENT ORDER can be issued by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after authorization by the Secretary of Defense, to do the following:
a. Increase deployability posture of units
b. Decrease deployability posture of units
c. Deploy forces
d. Redeploy forces*
e. Direct any other action that would signal planned U.S. military action or its termination in response to a particular crisis event or incident
In an ongoing war, the change of CINCs is inconsequential to the already standing congressional authorization of the combat action itself.
So, a man (SecDef) tells another man (CJCS), both of whom have been approved by the Senate, to issue an order in the ongoing war.
I would argue strongly that this falls under military regulation, and that it is critical to the safety of our troops that individual deployees are not permitted to determine the authority of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Even if personally signed by the president, I would argue that the war/combat action, once it is authorized by Congress, must also demonstrate the unconstiutionality of the Congress that authorized.
Sooner or later we’ll have a case that’ll fly.