Posted on 09/04/2009 11:15:54 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I think some choice exposure of Valerie Jarrett (D-IL) would be in order as well, and perhaps even Michelle M’Bell’s background - unless female radicals and “a man’s wife” are somehow off limits for reasons of “chivalry”. They are probably, however, his truly closest advisors.
I know I’m supposed to be amused by the parody, but all I can think is that Sig Sauer sounds awesome, whereas Van Jones is plain scary.
“but all I can think is that Sig Sauer sounds awesome, whereas Van Jones is plain scary”
I should clarify that I’m no “Bircher” or monarchist, but monarchists, anarchists, and the like amuse me, because I know their visions will never materialize. Eccentrics are loveable. We need more of them in public life.
What we don’t need are lefties like Jones, because it is a very real possibility that his vision will be instituted. A vast movement stands behind him, in the form of environmentalists, race-hustlers, economic jusiticers, etc. It’s an open conspiracy. Cap-n-Trade and Universal Healthcare, which dominate headlines, wouldn’t be a blip on our radar without them.
What have you been up to, you RAPSCALLION???!?!?
-—FYI, his opinion of the Second is that it is only a collective right and only applies to the federal gov’t-—
Yeah, I can imagine...
Ready...Aim...
Van Jones has already been endorsed by a prominent republican that is a “huge fan”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSn37TMXZO8&feature=player_embedded
That will come back and bite her in the ass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.