[Cronos]

That’s one article — the “proof” hasn’t been accepted as fact. I’m not denying they MAY have, but there is no incontrovertible proof. Even the article stating that is not “proof” per se, just one man’s opinion

[nathanbedford]

My son, my son I earnestly beg your indulgence (you should excuse the expression) I did not understand what you required when you said there is no "real" proof, that there was no "definite" proof.

Forgive my trespasses for I had not understood, my son, that archaeological proof accepted by virtually every authority around the secular world was not the sort of proof you require.

I did not understand that you require conclusive proof, cosmic proof, everlasting proof, proof positive, transcendental proof, ineffable proof, beyond a reasonable doubt proof, 180 proof, Jesuitical proof.

yours in Christ,

Monsignor McBedford