Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leenie312; Marty62; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ..

That is shocking ... no FBI security clearances .. it’s done by the freaking White Thug House ??? This article’s essence was bad enough. My neck’s going into spasms from shaking my head so much ... every day, every single damn day .. another despicable depravity.

__________________________________________________

EXCLUSIVE: Top secret clearances flawed at Pentagon
One-fourth have ‘derogatory’ data

By Shaun Waterman THE WASHINGTON TIMES | Thursday, June 4, 2009

###

Excerpt:

The Pentagon may have issued top-secret clearances last year to as many as one-in-four applicants who had “significant derogatory information” in their backgrounds, including a record of foreign influence or criminal conduct, a little- noticed government audit says.

*snip*

Ms. Eshoo was responding to an audit published last month by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) warning one in four top-secret clearances issued by the Pentagon last year had no record of why officials had approved the applicant despite “significant derogatory information” that raised security concerns - most frequently about foreign influence or criminal conduct.

The audit also found that nearly nine in 10 new top-secret clearances last year were granted even though background investigation files on the applicant “were missing at least one type of documentation,” most often employment verification.

The Pentagon granted more than 450,000 initial security clearances, and another 180,000 renewals, to military personnel, civilian employees and private contractors last year, based on the results of background investigations conducted by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Auditors reached their conclusions by examining a random sample of 3,500 files on top-secret clearances granted in July last year.

GAO auditors said their report concentrated on top-secret clearances because people with them “have access to information that, if improperly disclosed, could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security.”

The risks inherent in granting security clearances to the wrong people are illustrated by the case of Noureddine Malki, a naturalized U.S. citizen who worked as a contract translator for the U.S. military in Iraq. Last year, Malki was sentenced to 10 years in prison and stripped of his citizenship after pleading guilty of lying about his background, biography and even his name in his applications for citizenship and later a top-secret security clearance.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/04/pentagon-audit-finds-flaws-in-clearances/


42 posted on 08/24/2009 6:05:45 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE

That is shocking ... no FBI security clearances ..


I just posted this on another thread. Maybe it belongs here as well.

D. Eisenhower l954 Communist Control Act S.3706 Makes it illegal.. and empowers the FBI against communist organizations.

What happened to this law why isn’t it being used?

http://74.6.239.67/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=laws+against+communist+conspiracy&fr=yfp-t-150&u=www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php%3Fpid%3D9998&w=laws+against+communist+conspiracy&d=aouu4BlMTN54&icp=1&.intl=us


43 posted on 08/24/2009 6:17:03 PM PDT by Blu By U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: bellyjelly40

bookmark


46 posted on 08/24/2009 6:42:43 PM PDT by jcsjcm (Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: 444Flyer

bookmark


50 posted on 08/24/2009 11:30:29 PM PDT by 444Flyer (FReepers and freedom lovers, we are in a gigantic TUG-OF-WAR for our nation and our Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

This says it happened last year? We should find out more about who was/is running the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). This sure doesn’t sound good but it wasn’t done under the Thug’s watch. It was done under Bush’s. hmmmmmmm......

Thanks for the ping. Glenn’s show was awesome yesterday. God bless him for his bravery.


56 posted on 08/25/2009 5:51:20 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson