Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dianna
Before he was born, I saw no evidence compelling enough to take the risk with a newborn baby.

You made what you thought was the best decision for your son. My wife and I made the opposite decision for our sons believing that was in their best interests. The decision you made on behalf of your son is none of my business nor is the decision we made on behalf of our sons any of your business. Certainly, the government has no right to insert itself into the decision.

Frankly, I think that both sides on this debate greatly exaggerate their medical positions. Both sides greatly overstate the consequences of the decision on a minor medical procedure. I'm amazed how emotional some people get over this issue.

I don't think that male circumcision is a big deal, one way or the other. I do think that the issue of mandatory compliance (either way) is a big deal and all freedom-loving people should oppose.

128 posted on 08/24/2009 9:12:16 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: CommerceComet
I don't think that male circumcision is a big deal

What about female circumcision?

137 posted on 08/24/2009 6:43:38 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson