Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ETL
If increases in carbon dioxide, or any other greenhouse gas, could have in turn raised global temperatures, the positive feedback would have been catastrophic.

How can a scientist look at the data and come to any other conclusion. It really baffles the mind. Maybe us engineers know how to look at data better than scientists, but this data could not be any clearer. Are scientists really this illiterate in reading data???

8 posted on 08/22/2009 6:04:32 AM PDT by Always Right (It is not the Townhall crowds that are manufactured, but the Health Care Crisis that is manufactured)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right

Exactly. When CO2 levels rose after each natural warming period (dissolved out from naturally warming oceans —colder water more effectively holds CO2 in solution), no significant additional warming ever took place, all throughout that 400,000-year (ice core) interval that Al Bore and his climate comrades refer to.


12 posted on 08/22/2009 6:16:00 AM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson