Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie
It would constitute tyranny for a federal judge to pick and choose or rewrite which articles should be retained

So if a State put into its Constitution that no one in that state had to pay federal taxes, or serve in the U.S. armed forces, that would be enforceable? Nonsense. Article VI quite clearly says that the U.S. Constitution and federal laws are supreme over any State Constitution. And the federal courts have been exercising their power to strike down state laws as unconstitutional since at least Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, which was back in 1816.

27 posted on 08/19/2009 3:18:05 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

The states specifically granted powers long ago to tax incomes and raise armies to the federal government.

They granted no power to define marriage.


31 posted on 08/19/2009 3:35:44 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson