Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leilani

Exactly! No reasonably decent historian would write a biography about a president and not be able to verify which hospital he was born in, what health problems he may or maynot have had, and weather he was an honor student, or a just barely made it out of school student.

The only thing we know about Mr. Obama’s past is what he wrote in his 2, count ‘em two, autobiographies both written by the time he was 45. And both shown to have glowing misrepresentations, read LIES, about his past.

This guys background has more holes than a wheel of swiss cheese.


32 posted on 08/10/2009 12:36:47 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town
Yep. And strategically there are a couple of benefits to subsuming the issue about the BC underneath the more inclusive "general secrecy" banner.

By making a stink about what is undeniably his secrecy about the whole gamut of details he's hiding, you have the opportunity to bring a lot more people on board who aren't necessarily so transfixed about the arcane minutiae whether or not his mom was a resident for 14 consecutive yrs etc, but who might remember how the media studied in microscopic detail every aspect of GWB & Kerry's transcripts, even going so far as to 'weighting' their respective GPA's commensurately with the putative difficulty of their respective classloads. Remember that? I sure do. They'll say: Yeah. Wassup with that. How come we've heard nothing about his transcripts.

Second, by agitating under the broader rubrik of this man's strangely compulsive secrecy, the issue dovetails nicely with the profoundly secretive nature of his Presidency itself & offers a political payoff to his opposition; it reinforces all the secrecy of the "fishy" lists, the Czars, the stimulus bills hiding payments to political supporters, the details of his Health Control Act obscured by layers of bureaucratese.

I had a liberal who voted for O & who still supports him unfortunately tell me he had hoped BHO would be more like the black JFK but he's turning out to be the tan Nixon & it's just because of his eery compulsive secrecy-bordering-on-paranoia about everything.

I'm tellin ya, I think we're on to something here. Let's hit this broader point hard & hit it often and the rest (the BC, the transcripts the whole nine yards) will follow.

34 posted on 08/10/2009 1:03:08 PM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Jim from C-Town

“two autobiographies both written by the time he was 45”
+++++++++++++

Interesting - even here we see his continuous pattern of control/handling. He completely controlled even information about himself (with the gleeful, adulation, fawning approval of the idiot press) - not allowing objective 3rd party review.

We truly have a man from no where, an empty suit...’sound and fury, signifying nothing.’


39 posted on 08/10/2009 1:24:52 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try TRAITORS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson