Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death Drugs Cause Uproar in Oregon (Obamacare Preview)
ABC News/Health ^ | August 6, 2009 | Susan Donaldson James

Posted on 08/09/2009 2:39:50 PM PDT by WhiteCastle

The news from Barbara Wagner's doctor was bad, but the rejection letter from her insurance company was crushing.

The 64-year-old Oregon woman, whose lung cancer had been in remission, learned the disease had returned and would likely kill her. Her last hope was a $4,000-a-month drug that her doctor prescribed for her, but the insurance company refused to pay.

What the Oregon Health Plan did agree to cover, however, were drugs for a physician-assisted death. Those drugs would cost about $50.

"It was horrible," Wagner told ABCNews.com. "I got a letter in the mail that basically said if you want to take the pills, we will help you get that from the doctor and we will stand there and watch you die. But we won't give you the medication to live."

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; barbarawagner; bhohealthcare; cultureofdeath; deathcare; deathpanel; deathpanels; govthealthcare; obamacare; pharmaceuticals; rationedhealthcare; socializedmedicine; universalhealthcare; wreckingheakthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Grandma will get run over by Obama.
1 posted on 08/09/2009 2:39:50 PM PDT by WhiteCastle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

“Grandma got run over by Socialized Healthcare” might be a song there


2 posted on 08/09/2009 2:42:36 PM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

$4000 a month drug, and we wonder why socialism is taking root.


3 posted on 08/09/2009 2:46:04 PM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

TFA says the woman was a lifelong smoker. Hmmm. Didn’t we raise cigarette taxes to pay for their treatment?

Still, wowsers — pretty lame treatment of her by the bureaucracy. In any event, get ready for the ObamaCare “DMV agent” making decisions on when you may die. After all, this bill has been lobbyist approved.


4 posted on 08/09/2009 2:53:06 PM PDT by Sam_Damon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle
Copious-red-herrings alert. When everything is reduced to price, priorities are distorted and misperceived. The very debate itself is "socialized," which is no small part of the problem of endemic mindset of "socialization" that seems to have swept us like a plague of late.

Insurance is not a birthright, nor is any drug in particular. But most of all the issue of cost is device that derails the issue from its moral essentials.

5 posted on 08/09/2009 2:53:38 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

It’s market forces at work, DonaldC. Drug with limited use (can’t use it for headaches!) still costs almost $1B to develop. Patent life is limited (and much of it is eaten up by the development phase; actual time-on-market patent life is probably very short).

You want the best stuff? You gotta pay for the risks involved in coming up with it. You want cheaper stuff? Live with less efficacy and fewer choices.

Or we could do what Europe does, which is extend the patent life of drugs, so that companies can lower the prices as they have longer to recoup. But oops, Obama and the Congress already ruled that possibility out.

There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. Socialism is a big lie.


6 posted on 08/09/2009 2:55:10 PM PDT by pharmamom (Queen. Visit the Queendom: www.whenwearequeen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom

And they think Obamacare is going to pay for a $4000 drug at her age/??

I am not even sure they would for someone that was 30 years old.


7 posted on 08/09/2009 2:58:18 PM PDT by RummyChick ("Free Speech....is always the deadliest enemy of tyranny" Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sam_Damon

We raised taxes through the roof on tabacco to pay for more perks and pork for those in the elite political class, and raises for unions all around.

There is absolutely no incentive to ever devote one dime to tabacco cessation from the tax money. Don’t worry, non-smokers they will come for you soon enough.


8 posted on 08/09/2009 2:58:22 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

The best cure is euthanasia?

This is creepy. On a scale of one to ten, it rates about a twelve or thirteen.

This is not even hospice care, it is move the animals through the kill chute.

And who knows, the cancer may go into remission on its own even WITHOUT the $4,000 a month drug regimen. I understand some of the alternative medicines are reporting pretty surprising results.

But when you take away all hope, what is there?


9 posted on 08/09/2009 3:00:21 PM PDT by alloysteel (Never let an inanimate object know that you are in a hurry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle
More on "Tarceva" here.
10 posted on 08/09/2009 3:07:40 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam_Damon
If you are looking for a more sympathetic case, the same thing happened to a guy with prostate cancer. Expensive medicine denied, suicide pills offered.

He just died of his cancer.

Oregon has ranked the top 500+ health procedures in order of precedence. Interestingly, smoking cessation and obesity are higher on the list than an emergency appendectomy.

11 posted on 08/09/2009 3:10:56 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Doesn’t matter..give Obamacare a few years, and there will be no $4K/month drugs. Government-controlled medicine drives innovation from the market. There will be no incentive to take the financial/legal risks to develop treatments for conditions that are relatively rare, such as MS, specific forms of cancer, Huntington’s, etc., because government price controls will not allow the market to work.

The way the process works now, companies are incentivized to develop treatments for specific cancers, even though the incidence of the cancers is relatively low. They know that once they get an indication for end-stage cancer of a certain kind, physicians will expand the use of the medication to earlier stages of that particular form of cancer and also to other types of cancer. Thus, the actual market turns out to be bigger (and more profitable) than the apparent market. (Even this sort of innovation is being disincentivized by a government that threatens drugmakers with fraud charges when doctors utilize drugs for “off-label” treatment and also refuses to pay for off-label usage.)

Of course, the focus on medication costs requires us to ignore the fact that appropriate drug treatment actually tremendously reduces the overall cost of medical care. Obviously not in the case of end-stage cancer treatment, but in the treatment of chronic disease, by reducing hospitalization costs, trips to the ER, more costly treatment later, etc.


12 posted on 08/09/2009 3:31:02 PM PDT by pharmamom (Queen. Visit the Queendom: www.whenwearequeen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

And here’s an ironic twist: smokers are cheaper in the long run. They die earlier and faster, saving all the money that would otherwise be spent treating years of dementia and other chronic disease.


13 posted on 08/09/2009 3:32:17 PM PDT by pharmamom (Queen. Visit the Queendom: www.whenwearequeen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

Evidently, the drug company ponied up free medication for this woman. But I have a question. She is a great-grandmother. To me, that means she has an extensive family. Why are they not helping out with the costs? Part of being a proponent of subsidiarity (which I assume most Freepers are—it just means having the smallest human unit possible responsible for processes and activities) is having people rely on their families first, before they turn to their neighbors and then to total strangers.

I suspect that the woman’s family, along with a church community, could have handled a large part of the expense of this treatment. But they are never confronted with that question, because we have indeed “socialized” our minds to expect the government/large corporations to take care of us.

OTOH, we do need to have conversations about the marginal costs of care. $16,000 for a projected best-case scenario of six extra months of life. Would we spend $160,000?

At what point is a payer of any kind (government or insurance company) justified in denying payment for unproven treatment or very small increments of benefit? Just askin...


14 posted on 08/09/2009 3:47:08 PM PDT by pharmamom (Queen. Visit the Queendom: www.whenwearequeen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF
We raised taxes through the roof on tabacco to pay for more perks and pork for those in the elite political class, and raises for unions all around.

I was curious as to where all the tobacco tax and tobacco settlement money went. Wasn't it supposed to cover smoking related health costs?


15 posted on 08/09/2009 3:47:08 PM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: magooey

Yep. That was the lie. Bow they can raise taxes on smokers and no one complains - non-smokers smirk, but later they get their turn.


16 posted on 08/09/2009 3:49:28 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

I wonder if they want the $50 up front? maybe they take checks.........


17 posted on 08/09/2009 3:58:13 PM PDT by wafflehouse (RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteCastle

She still has an option at this point. In another 10 years, the ‘medical team’ will make the decision for folks like this so they don’t have to worry about their options.

Involuntary euthanasia is already being carried out in Europe.


18 posted on 08/09/2009 4:07:21 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Sung to the tune of Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer

Grandma got run over by Obama
Walking to the doctor’s without leave
You can say there’s no such thing as rationing
But as for me and Grandpa we believe

She’d been seeing Doc quite often
For her heart and lumbago
But one day she got a letter
Saying “sacrifice yourself; it’s time to go”

They found her DOA that mornin’
At the scene of the attack
“Rejected” stamped upon her forehead
And an incriminatin’ O upon her back

Grandma got run over by Obama
Walking to the doctor’s without leave
You can say there’s no such thing as rationing
But as for me and Grandpa we believe

Now we’re all so proud of Grandpa
They don’t have him on the run
See him in there watchin’ NASCAR
And clinging bitterly to God and guns

It’s just not the same without Grandma
She was too young to be whacked
Only 70 on her next birthday
But too old according to The One’s contract

Grandma got run over by Obama
Walking to the doctor’s without leave
You can say there’s no such thing as rationing
But as for me and Grandpa we believe

Now the funeral is over
And the family’s steeped in gloom
And now ACORN’s at the front door
Taking stock of Grandpa’s empty extra room

I’ve warned all my friends and neighbors
Better watch out for your health
We should never have elected
A man whose main concern is spreading wealth

Grandma got run over by Obama
Walking to the doctor’s without leave
You can say there’s no such thing as rationing
But as for me and Grandpa we believe!


19 posted on 08/09/2009 4:16:28 PM PDT by DFG (1 useless man is called a disgrace, 2 are called a law firm, 3 or more are called Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
$4000 a month drug, and we wonder why socialism is taking root.

When my husband was going though cancer treatments, they prescribed him Tarceva, because it was a prescription my health insurance would not cover it. All we had to do was call the manufacturer and they set us up so that I did not have to pay the $8000 for a 30 supply. I ended up paying $100 for it.
20 posted on 08/09/2009 4:23:40 PM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson