Replies

The shell game/scam continues only because we have spineless Republicans that took no action on January 8, 2009.

As many here know, O has always had the burden of proof on the issue of his eligibility.

He or others certified he was eligible in each of the state primaries, under penalty of perjury. That is a continuing duty albeit one that now may only be enforcable via politics.

On January 8, 2009 Congress had the duty pursuant to 3 USC
15 to assure the nation the President elect was qualified.
That it did not do so by calling for objections to the votes of the Electoral College almost certainly constitutes a Constitutional defect.

Here is what I wrote to my state politicans with a cc to my Attorney General:

***

Gentlemen:

America’s pre-election concern that it is the victim of a shell game continues to grow.

1) There is nothing in the public record that confirms Barak Obama is a citizen of the United States. Outlandish statement? Not at all.

Obama’s attorney assured the court in Hollister v Soetoro that Obama had placed a certified copy of his birth certificate on Factcheck.org. In fact, the single document located at Factcheck was a “certification” which Hawaii specifies is inconclusive for establishing citizenship. Moreover, expert document examiners have determined the document has been altered in several significant regards.

Further, the paper trail one expects to find behind every citizen has been sealed by Obama or has disappeared. Despite his assurance to the Hollister court Obama has expended great effort and legal expense to avoid producing evidence of citizenship.

2) To date, Obama has failed to demonstrate he is qualified for the office of the President. Obama acknowledged he has the burden of proving he is qualified when he certified by signature, his eligibility at the state level; that duty continues. Congress had the duty per the 20th Amendment and 3 USC 15 to declare the President elect was qualified and that the election was proper; that duty also continues.

Enclosed is a copy of a petition. How many signatures will you require in order to read the petition on the floor of your chamber and move that the requested action be taken?

***

(The petition can be viewed on my About Page.)

Congress is the only branch that can correct this Constitutional defect.

It will almost certainly require a nudge from the USSC if the issue is presented by one or more Republicans.

Those politicians and their prospective 2010 replacements need to step up while it is still possible.