Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Religious Fanaticism of the Left
NewsReal ^ | August 7, 2009 | David Horowitz

Posted on 08/07/2009 1:37:11 PM PDT by liesel2000

Rachel Maddow spent 40 minutes of her show trying to discredit people who don’t like the Obama trillion-dollar socialized medicine plan. Not a single word of analysis, only ad hominem attacks on citizen dissenters as mobsters and proto-nazis. But this is what leftists always do — target the messenger, discredit the opponent. As Lenin said: for progressives the object of a political debate is not to refute your opponent but to wipe him from the face of the earth. I never met a leftist who didn’t follow this prescription.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aads; agenda; angrymob; democrats; healthcare; liberalfascism; nazis; obama; obamacare; religiousleft

1 posted on 08/07/2009 1:37:11 PM PDT by liesel2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liesel2000

proto-nazis

If I’m going to be called something I at least should know what it is. What the $ell is a proto-nazi? And, should I be offended?


2 posted on 08/07/2009 1:50:06 PM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liesel2000
Eh, people on both sides do this. On this site, for instance, Libs are dismissed en masse as "Obamabots," and pictures are regularly posted of Obama smoking a cigarette, or photoshopped images of Dems in front of a banner saying "Dishonesty in Leadership." Is this really adding to the discourse? Or do they simply "target the messenger [and] discredit the opponent"?

It's done by everyone because it's effective rhetoric. We should criticize it sharply, but we shouldn't pretend we're innocent of this type of dismissal of the messenger.

3 posted on 08/07/2009 2:10:23 PM PDT by Devils Avocado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liesel2000
Maddow and other liberals view the vast majority of Americans as ignorant rubes and a dirty rabble. When ordinary citizens are vocally saying no to socialism, liberals can only conclude that they are too dumb to do this on their own and they must be dupes of talk radio, insurance companies etc. Liberalism is elitism to the core. Obama was perfectly serious when he commented about those “bitter people clinging to their guns and religion” because he holds middle America in contempt and disdain.
4 posted on 08/07/2009 3:01:37 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liesel2000

First of all, Maddow has an agenda. She has never claimed to be fair or unbiased. She is an atheistic homosexual, and she despises anything that smacks of religion. From her point of view, all theists should be locked up in an asylum. Her religion is liberalism, and she is on an unholy crusade to destroy conservatism and traditional values. In that sense, she is a perfect match of MSNBC. I would take everything that she says with a grain of salt.


5 posted on 08/07/2009 3:26:34 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson