Points taken. One would probably have to have the three items side by side to make a good visual comparison. Even then, the lack of detail on Orly’s document/jpeg is difficult to work with. Speaking of, I remember when I saw the jpeg for the first time the night of its posting, wondering if this was a first generation pic, why the proliferation of jpeg artifacts. I suspect though if anyone(I probably won’t take the time) were to make an overlay of Orly’s jpeg over the high resolution “forgery”, the available details would match perfectly. JMHO, of course.
What is not plain to me is whether Orly has a paper copy of the doc, or a photo of a paper copy.
Initial comments led me to believe that the photo that we saw was done by or for Orly, and that it was deliberately done to a low resolution. IOW, the cloth background is Orly’s or her photographer’s property. (?)