To: ForGod'sSake
What is not plain to me is whether Orly has a paper copy of the doc, or a photo of a paper copy.
Initial comments led me to believe that the photo that we saw was done by or for Orly, and that it was deliberately done to a low resolution. IOW, the cloth background is Orly’s or her photographer’s property. (?)
656 posted on
08/07/2009 3:25:30 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: editor-surveyor
I honestly haven't followed along closely enough to speak to your questions. Although the pic of the "forgery" appears pretty compelling to a layman like myself, if barrister Taitz never had her hands on a hard copy, shame on her.
659 posted on
08/07/2009 4:24:59 PM PDT by
ForGod'sSake
(You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST. Have I missed anything?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson