http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=7483#7483
That is just one post on the topic. There are a number of earlier ones on the long thread.
I don’t know what the devil Corsi thinks he’s doing, but his certificate is from the wrong province, is dated the year of O’s birth rather than the year that the Kenya COLB was issued, gets the wrong year for the Republic, and is wrong about the Zanzibar connection.
This whole business stinks.
We still don’t know if Taitz’s COLB is genuine, but sure as hell Corsi’s screed does nothing to disprove it. I don’t know what on earth WND is think of.
Really, I can’t figure out his point.
The Taitz image is of a CERTIFICATION from 1964 of a birth that supposedly happened in 1961. But Corsi’s comparing apples to oranges.
His crummy images are supposedly FROM 1961. Can he prove they didn’t change forms in the intervening years?
His images are from a book of registered births. At least, that’s what I assume. Actually, looks like a census record to me; but I’ll take him at his word.
Why such crummy images, anyway? I can’t even read most of the information.
In any case, this is like comparing Obama’s online COLB to the Nordyke twins’ actual photocopied ORIGINAL birth certificates.
They look nothing alike, but they wouldn’t, since they’re different documents which, nevertheless, represent events that supposedly happened within a day of each other at the same hospital. No COLB is going to look exactly like an original, long-form birth certificate! DUH!
What the heck are the editors at WND thinking?