Really, I can’t figure out his point.
The Taitz image is of a CERTIFICATION from 1964 of a birth that supposedly happened in 1961. But Corsi’s comparing apples to oranges.
His crummy images are supposedly FROM 1961. Can he prove they didn’t change forms in the intervening years?
His images are from a book of registered births. At least, that’s what I assume. Actually, looks like a census record to me; but I’ll take him at his word.
Why such crummy images, anyway? I can’t even read most of the information.
In any case, this is like comparing Obama’s online COLB to the Nordyke twins’ actual photocopied ORIGINAL birth certificates.
They look nothing alike, but they wouldn’t, since they’re different documents which, nevertheless, represent events that supposedly happened within a day of each other at the same hospital. No COLB is going to look exactly like an original, long-form birth certificate! DUH!
What the heck are the editors at WND thinking?
What the heck are the editors at WND thinking?
sumptin strange here-if CORSI can't write logically on this subject, ya gotta wonder....