Like a COLB, the documents merely point to official records, in many countries that is a entry in a log, not an individual document for each birth. That's why the Kenyan/Austrailian document had Book and Page numbers, so that the original record could be verified if necessary. That record would *normaly* still exist and have a decent chain of custody. But Kenya is run in part by Obama's cousin, Raile Odinga, who got his position by turning his thugs loose to burn and pillage, after he lost an election. Still a reasonable actual document might open up the records in Hawai`i via a court order. Those would have a good chain of custody, but would actually be easier to falsify, since there would be a single file for each person, most would be a single document. Persons who were adopted, or changed their name other than by marriage, might have more than a single document.
Great. So we essentially agree! The absolute best hope for evidence to remove a seated US president would come down to, at best, two easily falsifiable pieces of paper. Game over.
America had a chance to avoid this mess in 2008.
We have another chance to castrate this imposter's power in 2010.
If we keep playing into Rahm's birther/hater/loony-right playbook then we'll scare off the sensible middle for 2010 and hand him the dirty Chicago victory he's happy with.