Posted on 08/05/2009 6:59:30 AM PDT by naturalman1975
Thanks for posting....
sample law:
http://www.paclii.org/nr/legis/num_act/bdamo19571966293/
PART II - REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS.
Register of Births.
6.-(1) The Registrar shall register each birth occurring on the Island, particulars of which are furnished to him in accordance with this Ordinance and, for this purpose, shall maintain a Register of Births.
(2) The registration of a birth under this Part shall be effected by an entry in the Register of Births in accordance with Form l.
(3) The Administrator may certify that a register or record of births maintained or purporting to have been maintained under the authority or approval of the Administrator or a predecessor in office of the Administrator and in existence immediately prior to the commencement of this Ordinance is, to the best of his knowledge and belief, a true record of births that have occurred on the Island from and including the twenty-fifth day of January, 1915, and the register or record so certified shall form part of the Register of Births.
Particulars of birth to be furnished.
7.-(1) Subject to the next succeeding sub-section, where a child is born on the Island, a parent of the child shall within twenty-one days after the date of the birth, notify the Registrar of the birth and furnish to the Registrar such information as the Registrar requires for the purpose of registering the birth.
Penalty: Ten pounds.
(2) Where the notification of the birth of a child cannot be given by a parent of the child, the occupier of the building or place where the child is born shall, within twenty-one days after the date of the birth, notify the Registrar of the birth and furnish to the: Registrar such information as the Registrar requires for the purpose of registering the birth.
Penalty: Ten pounds.
Hi,
Great info. The link is to New South Wales and I’m not sure if their information is the same as South Australia.
I have no clue about Australia...
That is legislation for New South Wales.
You need to find the legislation for South Australia.
That is like citing a California law and claiming it applies to New York.
start finish |
7-1842 6-1856 |
6-1856 12-1874 |
1-1875 7-1907 |
7-1907 6-1948 |
6-1948 1-1968 |
1-1968 present |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of birth | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Place of birth | no | yes | > 1882 | yes | yes | yes |
Name of child | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Sex | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Father's full name | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Father's age, birth place | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
Father's occupation | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
Usual residence | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
Mother's maiden name | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Mother's age, birth place | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
Mother's former married surname | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
Year of marriage | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
Number of previous living, dead issue | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
Informant's signature, descriptn, residence | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Authorized person | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Registration District | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
Registration date | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
District Registrar's signature | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
I’m am not making any conclusions, simply posting information that might be tangentially related.
According to that chart, the Bomford cert should NOT have his mother’s maiden surname on it...
but it does.
obumpa
What year is that New Zealand BC ???
It is recent because the form is in Maori also
By law everything has to be in both lauguages now...
Um - take a look at the common format of all of Australian birth certificates posted - now have a look at the 'Kenyan' certificate.
Do you have any that look similar that you can post?
Yes, and I've posted them here. The similarities seem pretty obvious to me. I can't post anything that looks identical because there are slight differences from state to state and time to time, but the overall format has been consistent for at least fifty years. The certificates from NSW, Queensland, and Victoria show the similarities, and so does the Kenyan certificate. I'd love to be able to find a South Australian certificate from the same period which should be identical - I haven't been able to so far.
So far, Im sticking with the Kenya one is real and the Austalia one is a fake, made to look like the Kenya one on purpose and uploaded just to throw everyone offtrack.
So an Australian format birth certificate must be a fake when it comes from Australia, but it's genuine when it shows up in Kenya?
Utter garbage.
Common law refers to part of British constitutional law. It does mean that most law is identical in all places that use Common law - it just means there are certain ancient underlying principles that apply.
Acts of the British Parliament do not generally apply in Australia and haven't since 1942 when the Australian government ratified the Statute of Westminster of 1931. That statute made it explicit than an Act of the British Parliament would only apply in Australia if the Australian government chose to incorporate it into Australian law.
The English Common Law of Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 (assuming such an act exists - I haven't checked but the name doesn't look like it's in the right format to me) never applied in Australia.
How could Douglas Gordon Young work for this office in 1964 when it wasnt created until 1975
Because the Bomford certificate is from SOUTH AUSTRALIA. The quote given here is from NEW SOUTH WALES. They are different states with different state government departments.
Like the United States, Australia is a collection of states with some powers reserved to the states, and some in the hands of the federal government under the Constitution of Australia. Registration of Births is a state level responsibility, handled by state government departments.
Hi,
Thank you. I figured that out a few minutes after I posted. :-)
This would all be much simpler if we didn’t have states...
Funny then that the one that you did post from the early to mid 60s looks nothing like the "Bomford"/Australian or "Obama"/Kenyan ones.
What we need are other South Australia BCs from that period, or other Kenyan ones from the same time frame
Just playing devil's advocate, could it be that South Australia changed methods and terminology 11 years before New South Wales? (Bomford is from South Australis, that info was from New South Wales.
It's like being suprised that Texas doesn't have the same birth certificate format a New York.
Yeah, after I visited the link to the actual site and saw that it was for South Wales I realized it didn’t apply. That was about five minutes after my post.
Thanks! :-)
Do you expect me to have a copy of every single type of Australian birth certificate ever issued? I think that's a bit unrealistic.
What I can do is show that there was a common format (that is what it is actually called) used for all Australian birth certificates and provide examples that show that format. A format that is evident on the Bomford certificate as well.
Let's look at this together.
The first five birth certificates in that composite are Australia (the alleged Bomford certificate is included). I think the commonality of features between all five certificates is pretty obvious personally. The last three are from elsewhere in the Commonwealth (England, Canada, Rhodesia). They are obviously different.
The alleged Bomford certificate looks like an Australian certificate. So does the alleged Kenyan certificate.
Gidday mate,
Having them side-by-side is a helpful way to look at it. Thanks — I wonder if it might be convenient for you to please place the four-or-five Australian certificates next to this “Kenyan” one, for ease of comparisons?
I am going into our safe to fetch out our family’s certificates, just for the Hell of it, to have a look-see. Between us in my family we have British, Canadian and NZ certificates covering the Obama birth period — all Commonwealth countries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.