Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. May Maintain Tactical Nuke Arms For Attack Submarines
AP ^ | July 30, 2009

Posted on 08/04/2009 11:12:23 AM PDT by Fennie

WASHINGTON -- The United States may maintain Tomahawk cruise missiles with nuclear warheads for nuclear-powered attack submarines in the medium term, under a comprehensive review of its nuclear warfare policy which is now under way, a senior U.S. government official said Wednesday.

The official said during an interview with Kyodo News it depends on U.S. allies to decide if the nuclear-armed Tomahawk cruise missiles will be decommissioned.

The remark apparently pays consideration to Japan, which has asked the United States not to unilaterally decide to reduce or abandon tactical nuclear arms.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS: bho44; iran; iraq; islam; israel; jihad; obama; wot

1 posted on 08/04/2009 11:12:23 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

150-kt is not a tactical nuke.


2 posted on 08/04/2009 11:13:40 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

SBLMs with nuke war heads are things we ought to keep in the inventory.


3 posted on 08/04/2009 11:16:08 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
SBLMs with nuke war heads are things we ought to keep in the inventory.

Especially since ours actually work! God bless the D5. Unlike the poor Bulava, which is embarrassingly failure prone.

4 posted on 08/04/2009 11:22:24 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: magslinger; Jet Jaguar
Tomahawk.....ping


5 posted on 08/04/2009 11:27:19 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan

Roge-o, Tony!


6 posted on 08/04/2009 11:27:57 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I don’t see any reason to get rid of our tactical nukes. I can sorta understand (but not agree with) the reasoning behind getting rid of the weapons that are designed to kill civilian populations. Tactical nukes are our best chance of disarming a nuclear power and stopping a counterattack before it starts.

We’d probably be safer if we had more small precise nukes than having a bunch of big dumb ones.


7 posted on 08/04/2009 11:33:28 AM PDT by RogerAdams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey; SmithL

TLAM-N ping


8 posted on 08/04/2009 11:34:36 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Don’t decommission them, give them to Taiwan and South Korea.


9 posted on 08/04/2009 11:43:01 AM PDT by Bobalu (I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Bump


10 posted on 08/04/2009 11:44:03 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

I like the way you think.


11 posted on 08/04/2009 12:20:00 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

I like this plan. I don’t like when people talk about communist China, as far as I’m concerned, Taiwan is the seat of China’s only legitimate government and the mainland is in a state of Communist Rebellion.

Let’s help our Taiwanese allies get their country back.


12 posted on 08/04/2009 1:14:42 PM PDT by RogerAdams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
...it depends on U.S. allies to decide if the nuclear-armed Tomahawk cruise missiles will be decommissioned. The remark apparently pays consideration to Japan, which has asked the United States not to unilaterally decide to reduce or abandon tactical nuclear arms.

13 posted on 08/04/2009 1:48:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Funny, since George H. W. Bush unilaterally took TLAM-N off of boats and skimmers at the end of his term.


14 posted on 08/04/2009 2:06:38 PM PDT by Doohickey (I try to take my days one at a time, but occasionally several days attack me at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

That’s what I thought too. Everything I’ve seen says the TLAM-N has been retired.


15 posted on 08/04/2009 2:24:31 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

After thinking about it a little, TLAM-N was removed from operational launch platforms, but were maintained at the depot. As I recall, each SSN squadron had a “re-gen” boat went though all the special weapon handling hoopla including NTPI/DNSI.

Over 15 years since I last stood a watch as NWSG and I still remember the two man rule. Sad, really. :)


16 posted on 08/04/2009 2:37:29 PM PDT by Doohickey (I try to take my days one at a time, but occasionally several days attack me at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Looks like someone is going to lose their job because they “Stand in the way” of Obama’s grand plan...


17 posted on 08/04/2009 9:41:30 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson